Digital platforms for academia–industry knowledge exchange: characterisation, functions, and types

Digital platforms have transformed how goods and services are exchanged, but their role in knowledge exchange, particularly between academia and industry, remains underexplored. Like dating apps that help match unique and diverse individuals virtually, digital platforms facilitate interactions between academia and industry. However, exactly how they do that remains open. Drawing on the digital platform and the knowledge transfer intermediation literature, we conduct multiple case studies analysing the functionality of nine digital platforms that support interactions between academia and industry. Each of the studied platforms performs five key functions: reducing proximity limitations and transaction costs, engaging with users’ knowledge, supporting knowledge codification, transforming knowledge, and facilitating matchmaking. Notably, two functions, knowledge engagement and transformation, vary along continuums from surface-level to deep interaction and from generalisation to personalisation. Following these continuums, we distinguish four platform types: display-window, relationship-enabler, broker, and deep-dive. By revealing how digital platforms facilitate knowledge exchange between academia and industry, we substantiate the literature on innovation intermediaries and illustrate how digital platforms overcome limitations of classical intermediaries. We reframe academia–industry interaction as a platform-enabled process and show how digital platforms allow for knowledge-based digital matchmaking prior to any interaction between individuals, in contrast to traditional collaboration scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industry and Innovation
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2025.2530490
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital platforms for academia–industry knowledge exchange: characterisation, functions, and types

Martin Kalthaus, Henry Etzkowitz, Ekaterina Albats
4 citations
Industry and Innovation
Innovation and Knowledge Management
8.91
article

Digital platforms for academia–industry knowledge exchange: characterisation, functions, and types

Martin Kalthaus, Henry Etzkowitz, Ekaterina Albats
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Digital platforms have transformed how goods and services are exchanged, but their role in knowledge exchange, particularly between academia and industry, remains underexplored. Like dating apps that help match unique and diverse individuals virtually, digital platforms facilitate interactions between academia and industry. However, exactly how they do that remains open. Drawing on the digital platform and the knowledge transfer intermediation literature, we conduct multiple case studies analysing the functionality of nine digital platforms that support interactions between academia and industry. Each of the studied platforms performs five key functions: reducing proximity limitations and transaction costs, engaging with users’ knowledge, supporting knowledge codification, transforming knowledge, and facilitating matchmaking. Notably, two functions, knowledge engagement and transformation, vary along continuums from surface-level to deep interaction and from generalisation to personalisation. Following these continuums, we distinguish four platform types: display-window, relationship-enabler, broker, and deep-dive. By revealing how digital platforms facilitate knowledge exchange between academia and industry, we substantiate the literature on innovation intermediaries and illustrate how digital platforms overcome limitations of classical intermediaries. We reframe academia–industry interaction as a platform-enabled process and show how digital platforms allow for knowledge-based digital matchmaking prior to any interaction between individuals, in contrast to traditional collaboration scenarios.

Industry and InnovationVol. 32(9)
University of Southern Denmark (DK), VA Center for Clinical Management Research (US), Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (FI), Stanford University (US)
Liikesivistysrahasto
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
8.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.