Comparative study between sequential chemoradiotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer

Background: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a prevalent malignancy in South Asia with a high burden of unresectable cases at presentation. Chemoradiotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment, with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) offering improved tumor control but at the cost of higher toxicity. The study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and treatment-related toxicities of sequential chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with unresectable locally advanced ESCC. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted at Khwaja Yunus Ali Medical College and Hospital, Sirajganj, from January 2020 to June 2021. A total of 62 patients with histologically confirmed unresectable ESCC were randomly assigned to two groups: Arm A (CCRT) and Arm B (SCRT), with 31 patients in each group. Results: The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two arms. At 24 weeks, complete response rates were slightly higher in Arm A (51.61%) than in Arm B (41.93%), though not statistically significant (p>0.05). Toxicity analysis revealed a significantly higher incidence of Grade III esophagitis in the CCRT group (22.58% vs 3.23%; p=0.001). Hematologic and late radiation-related toxicities were also more frequent in Arm A. Weight loss and need for nutritional support (e.g., NG tube) were more common in the CCRT group, although not statistically significant. Conclusions: While both treatment strategies showed similar tumor response rates, SCRT was associated with a more favorable toxicity profile. Thus, SCRT may serve as an effective and safer alternative for patients with unresectable locally advanced ESCC, especially in resource-constrained settings or among patients with borderline performance status.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20252386
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study between sequential chemoradiotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer

Mohammad Ruhul Amin Bhuiyan, M. Ershadul Haque, Nayan Bhowmik, Barun Kumar Das et al.
International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Comparative study between sequential chemoradiotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer

Mohammad Ruhul Amin Bhuiyan, M. Ershadul Haque, Nayan Bhowmik, Barun Kumar Das, A. Z. M. Sumsuzoha, Muhammad Adnan Arifeen, Ahammad Al Mamun Sweet, Khandakar MD Rezwan Bayzid
article en

Abstract

Background: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a prevalent malignancy in South Asia with a high burden of unresectable cases at presentation. Chemoradiotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment, with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) offering improved tumor control but at the cost of higher toxicity. The study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and treatment-related toxicities of sequential chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with unresectable locally advanced ESCC. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted at Khwaja Yunus Ali Medical College and Hospital, Sirajganj, from January 2020 to June 2021. A total of 62 patients with histologically confirmed unresectable ESCC were randomly assigned to two groups: Arm A (CCRT) and Arm B (SCRT), with 31 patients in each group. Results: The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two arms. At 24 weeks, complete response rates were slightly higher in Arm A (51.61%) than in Arm B (41.93%), though not statistically significant (p>0.05). Toxicity analysis revealed a significantly higher incidence of Grade III esophagitis in the CCRT group (22.58% vs 3.23%; p=0.001). Hematologic and late radiation-related toxicities were also more frequent in Arm A. Weight loss and need for nutritional support (e.g., NG tube) were more common in the CCRT group, although not statistically significant. Conclusions: While both treatment strategies showed similar tumor response rates, SCRT was associated with a more favorable toxicity profile. Thus, SCRT may serve as an effective and safer alternative for patients with unresectable locally advanced ESCC, especially in resource-constrained settings or among patients with borderline performance status.

International Journal of Research in Medical SciencesVol. 13(8)
Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College (BD), North East University (BD), Dinajpur Medical College (BD), Chattagram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College (BD), Hospital São Rafael (BR), National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital (BD), Rangpur Medical College, Khwaja Yunus Ali Medical College
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.