A predictive metamodel for college football

Despite the large number of systems that have been developed for rating and ranking major college football teams in the United States, only two prior studies have attempted to identify an ensemble of those models – i.e., a metamodel – that is most predictive of future game results. Using 29 college football rating systems, data for 5925 games during 2016–24, and a k -fold cross-validation process focused on model predictiveness, a five-system metamodel is developed to predict the victory margin for games in the ensuing week. The model achieves strong results vis-à-vis the opening, midweek, and closing betting lines, and is statistically significant in the presence of the opening line in validation and test samples. The model is potentially useful for the College Football Playoff committee, media, fans, the betting market, and oddsmakers, and provides a benchmark against which future rating systems can be assessed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Analytics
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/22150218251365223
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A predictive metamodel for college football

Birgit Coleman
Journal of Sports Analytics
Sports Analytics and Performance
article

A predictive metamodel for college football

Birgit Coleman
article en

Abstract

Despite the large number of systems that have been developed for rating and ranking major college football teams in the United States, only two prior studies have attempted to identify an ensemble of those models – i.e., a metamodel – that is most predictive of future game results. Using 29 college football rating systems, data for 5925 games during 2016–24, and a k -fold cross-validation process focused on model predictiveness, a five-system metamodel is developed to predict the victory margin for games in the ensuing week. The model achieves strong results vis-à-vis the opening, midweek, and closing betting lines, and is statistically significant in the presence of the opening line in validation and test samples. The model is potentially useful for the College Football Playoff committee, media, fans, the betting market, and oddsmakers, and provides a benchmark against which future rating systems can be assessed.

Journal of Sports AnalyticsVol. 11
University of North Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Sports Analytics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.