Anti-Corruption Reform in Uzbekistan: What Can Be Learned from Singapore?

Corruption remains a major impediment to sustainable development and effective governance in Uzbekistan. This article offers a critical examination of Singapore’s widely regarded anti-corruption model and investigates how its core principles might be adapted to the Uzbek context. It identifies four key lessons: the imperative of sustained political will, the establishment of an independent and empowered anti-corruption agency, the necessity of impartial legal enforcement, and the significance of public education in fostering a culture of integrity. The article argues that Uzbekistan stands to benefit from institutional reforms that strengthen meritocratic governance, reinforce the autonomy of oversight institutions, and enhance legal transparency. While recognizing the structural and political differences between the two countries, the study concludes that Singapore’s experience offers a compelling framework for Uzbekistan to develop a more effective, context-sensitive strategy to combat corruption through legal reform, capacity building, and long-term political commitment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Law and Policy
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.342
Primary Topic
Bangladesh Politics, Society, and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anti-Corruption Reform in Uzbekistan: What Can Be Learned from Singapore?

Feruza Mamadaliyeva
International Journal of Law and Policy
Bangladesh Politics, Society, and Development
article

Anti-Corruption Reform in Uzbekistan: What Can Be Learned from Singapore?

Feruza Mamadaliyeva
article en

Abstract

Corruption remains a major impediment to sustainable development and effective governance in Uzbekistan. This article offers a critical examination of Singapore’s widely regarded anti-corruption model and investigates how its core principles might be adapted to the Uzbek context. It identifies four key lessons: the imperative of sustained political will, the establishment of an independent and empowered anti-corruption agency, the necessity of impartial legal enforcement, and the significance of public education in fostering a culture of integrity. The article argues that Uzbekistan stands to benefit from institutional reforms that strengthen meritocratic governance, reinforce the autonomy of oversight institutions, and enhance legal transparency. While recognizing the structural and political differences between the two countries, the study concludes that Singapore’s experience offers a compelling framework for Uzbekistan to develop a more effective, context-sensitive strategy to combat corruption through legal reform, capacity building, and long-term political commitment.

International Journal of Law and PolicyVol. 3(7)
Tashkent State Agrarian University (UZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Bangladesh Politics, Society, and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Anti-Corruption Reform in Uzbekistan: What Can Be Learned from Singapore? — Feruza Mamadaliyeva · International Journal of Law and Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS