Presenting Cues to Promote Clinical Reasoning in Physical Assessment for Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Randomized Controlled Study

Introduction: Physical assessment is a fundamental clinical skill in nursing practice and crucial to developing effective nursing care plans. Thus, acquiring knowledge and skills in physical assessment is an essential competence for undergraduate nursing students. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of utilizing pre-assignment work and presenting specific cues about a case on the clinical reasoning skills of undergraduate nursing students by comparing an intervention group that received specific cues with a control group that did not. Materials: This randomized controlled trial involved second-year undergraduate nursing students. Participants were randomly assigned to an intervention or control group. Both groups completed a pre-assignment related to heart failure and participated in a 60-minute group case study session. The intervention group received specific cues related to the case during the session, guiding their assessment and care planning. Clinical reasoning skills were evaluated subjectively using the Clinical Reasoning Skills Self-Assessment Scale (CRSS) and objectively by analyzing the students’ responses to the group task. Results: A total of 94 participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n= 47) or the control group (n= 47). While the pre-session CRSS scores were similar between groups, the post-session scores on several items related to information gathering, interpretation, problem identification, and goal setting were significantly higher in the intervention group. Qualitative analysis of narrative responses revealed that the intervention group provided more specific and patient-centered nursing care plans based on the patient's symptoms, whereas the control group offered more generalized interventions. Conclusion: The use of pre-assignment and specific cues enhanced students’ ability to interpret patient information and formulate individualized nursing care plans. This approach effectively improved clinical reasoning skills in physical assessment and may serve as a practical alternative in educational settings lacking simulation-based resources.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
NSC Nursing
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32549/opi-nsc-124
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Presenting Cues to Promote Clinical Reasoning in Physical Assessment for Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Randomized Controlled Study

Akiko Sugimoto, Akifumi Maeda, Motoko Hori, Akemi Hirao
NSC Nursing
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
article

Presenting Cues to Promote Clinical Reasoning in Physical Assessment for Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Randomized Controlled Study

Akiko Sugimoto, Akifumi Maeda, Motoko Hori, Akemi Hirao
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Physical assessment is a fundamental clinical skill in nursing practice and crucial to developing effective nursing care plans. Thus, acquiring knowledge and skills in physical assessment is an essential competence for undergraduate nursing students. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of utilizing pre-assignment work and presenting specific cues about a case on the clinical reasoning skills of undergraduate nursing students by comparing an intervention group that received specific cues with a control group that did not. Materials: This randomized controlled trial involved second-year undergraduate nursing students. Participants were randomly assigned to an intervention or control group. Both groups completed a pre-assignment related to heart failure and participated in a 60-minute group case study session. The intervention group received specific cues related to the case during the session, guiding their assessment and care planning. Clinical reasoning skills were evaluated subjectively using the Clinical Reasoning Skills Self-Assessment Scale (CRSS) and objectively by analyzing the students’ responses to the group task. Results: A total of 94 participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n= 47) or the control group (n= 47). While the pre-session CRSS scores were similar between groups, the post-session scores on several items related to information gathering, interpretation, problem identification, and goal setting were significantly higher in the intervention group. Qualitative analysis of narrative responses revealed that the intervention group provided more specific and patient-centered nursing care plans based on the patient's symptoms, whereas the control group offered more generalized interventions. Conclusion: The use of pre-assignment and specific cues enhanced students’ ability to interpret patient information and formulate individualized nursing care plans. This approach effectively improved clinical reasoning skills in physical assessment and may serve as a practical alternative in educational settings lacking simulation-based resources.

NSC NursingVol. 3(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Presenting Cues to Promote Clinical Reasoning in Physical Assessment for Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Randomized Controlled Study — Akiko Sugimoto, Akifumi Maeda, et al. · NSC Nursing (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS