RECONCEPTUALISING AUDIENCE IN ACADEMIC SCHOLARSHIP: NAVIGATING THE COMPLEXITIES OF SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION AND INTENDED READERSHIP

This paper examines the idea of the intended audience in academic writing. It explores the various layers of readership involved in creating scholarly work. The paper demonstrates that academic authors frequently envision their audience as peers in their field. At the same time, they must deal with institutional expectations, policy implications, and the need for public engagement. Drawing on theories from the sociology of knowledge and scholarly communication, the study challenges the choices scholars make regarding their audience. It also examines how these choices influence the production, presentation, and reception of knowledge. By reviewing existing literature, this paper highlights the challenges of writing for peers, fulfilling institutional performance goals, and reaching a broader audience. The study critically analyses how neoliberal pressures are changing academic output. This matter focuses on impact metrics and the push for open-access publishing. Additionally, it considers how digital platforms and decolonial approaches are broadening and diversifying scholarly audiences.