This Week in The Journal

How do people balance speed and accuracy during decision-making?To make decisions, the brain gathers evidence and commits to a choice when enough information has accumulated.In this issue, Kira et al. explored how flexible the threshold of sufficient evidence accumulation is in response to costs associated with the time it takes to deliberate.In their study, participants judged the direction of motion in random-dot displays of varying difficulty.Participant choices and reaction times followed the patterns expected from an evidence accumulation process: the amount of evidence to inform a choice gradually decreased as time passed within a trial.Partway through trials, and without the participants' awareness, the authors introduced random deadlines that caused some trials to end prematurely.Kira and colleagues used a computational method they developed to estimate decision-making changes over time.This approach confirmed that the amount of information required for a decision decreases as a function of time and that this reduction in evidence criteria occurs even faster under time pressure.According to the authors, these findings highlight the brain's flexibility in determining when to stop deliberating and commit to a choice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.twij.45.31.2025
Primary Topic
Academic Writing and Publishing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

This Week in The Journal

Paige McKeon
Journal of Neuroscience
Academic Writing and Publishing
article

This Week in The Journal

Paige McKeon
article en

Abstract

How do people balance speed and accuracy during decision-making?To make decisions, the brain gathers evidence and commits to a choice when enough information has accumulated.In this issue, Kira et al. explored how flexible the threshold of sufficient evidence accumulation is in response to costs associated with the time it takes to deliberate.In their study, participants judged the direction of motion in random-dot displays of varying difficulty.Participant choices and reaction times followed the patterns expected from an evidence accumulation process: the amount of evidence to inform a choice gradually decreased as time passed within a trial.Partway through trials, and without the participants' awareness, the authors introduced random deadlines that caused some trials to end prematurely.Kira and colleagues used a computational method they developed to estimate decision-making changes over time.This approach confirmed that the amount of information required for a decision decreases as a function of time and that this reduction in evidence criteria occurs even faster under time pressure.According to the authors, these findings highlight the brain's flexibility in determining when to stop deliberating and commit to a choice.

Journal of NeuroscienceVol. 45(31)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Academic Writing and Publishing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

This Week in The Journal — Paige McKeon · Journal of Neuroscience (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS