Reckoning in Mennonite Peace Theology: Reinhold Niebuhr’s Realism and Four Waves of Development

This article sketches four waves of Mennonite peace theology—nonresistance, transformation, reckoning, and responsibility—by recapitulating the influence of Reinhold Niebuhr’s realism in their development. The first wave accepted Niebuhr’s distinction between nonresistance and nonviolence and chose the former (Guy Franklin Hershberger). The second wave was realistic about the self-interest of the state but tended not to be realistic about Christian pacifist groups, at least not in the Niebuhrian sense of accepting sin as a permanent factor in history in the Christian communities they conceptualized and the vision inspiring peacebuilding beyond churches (John Howard Yoder and John Paul Lederach). The third wave is realistic about the church, interrogating and reckoning with sin in Anabaptist church histories, institutions, and communities (Malinda Berry). The emerging fourth wave carries forward elements of the three other waves in the course of developing movements exercising self-critical responsibility. The grassroots movement Mennonite Action is a “front light” of this fourth wave.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Moral Theology
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55476/001c.142713
Primary Topic
Religion, Society, and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reckoning in Mennonite Peace Theology: Reinhold Niebuhr’s Realism and Four Waves of Development

Janna L. Hunter-Bowman
Journal of Moral Theology
Religion, Society, and Development
article

Reckoning in Mennonite Peace Theology: Reinhold Niebuhr’s Realism and Four Waves of Development

Janna L. Hunter-Bowman
article en

Abstract

This article sketches four waves of Mennonite peace theology—nonresistance, transformation, reckoning, and responsibility—by recapitulating the influence of Reinhold Niebuhr’s realism in their development. The first wave accepted Niebuhr’s distinction between nonresistance and nonviolence and chose the former (Guy Franklin Hershberger). The second wave was realistic about the self-interest of the state but tended not to be realistic about Christian pacifist groups, at least not in the Niebuhrian sense of accepting sin as a permanent factor in history in the Christian communities they conceptualized and the vision inspiring peacebuilding beyond churches (John Howard Yoder and John Paul Lederach). The third wave is realistic about the church, interrogating and reckoning with sin in Anabaptist church histories, institutions, and communities (Malinda Berry). The emerging fourth wave carries forward elements of the three other waves in the course of developing movements exercising self-critical responsibility. The grassroots movement Mennonite Action is a “front light” of this fourth wave.

Journal of Moral TheologyVol. 14(2)
Anabaptist Mennonite Biblical Seminary (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Religion, Society, and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.