Comparison of motor performance in typically developing children engaged in gymnastics and classical ballet

[Purpose] This study aimed to compare the motor skills of typically developing children with different movement experiences, specifically classical ballet and gymnastics. [Participants and Methods] The participants included 52 typically developing children aged 4-6 years (25 boys and 27 girls) from Kindergarten. The boys engaged in weekly gymnastics and girls engaged in weekly classical ballet under the guidance of specialized instructors. Motor skills were assessed using the 25-m run, tennis ball throw, double-leg continuous jump, and standing long jump tests incorporated in the motor skills test. Balance ability was evaluated using static standing tests with eyes open and closed on a firm floor and foam rubber pad, each for 30 s. The total locus length and circumferential area were calculated. [Results] The boys demonstrated significantly greater throwing distance in tennis ball throws and superior performance in the standing long jump than girls. In the balance test, girls exhibited greater stability than boys in the static standing with eyes open on firm as well as foam rubber pad conditions, as measured by the total locus length. In addition, girls in the following test conditions had smaller circumferential areas than boys: static standing with eyes open and closed on a firm floor and static standing with eyes closed on a foam rubber pad. [Conclusion] These findings suggest that early childhood motor skills vary according to the type of movement experienced.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physical Therapy Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.37.403
Primary Topic
Children's Physical and Motor Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of motor performance in typically developing children engaged in gymnastics and classical ballet

Saori Tanaka, Kayoko Nonaka, Shinichiro Oka, Nobuya Harada et al.
Journal of Physical Therapy Science
Children's Physical and Motor Development
article

Comparison of motor performance in typically developing children engaged in gymnastics and classical ballet

Saori Tanaka, Kayoko Nonaka, Shinichiro Oka, Nobuya Harada, Nozomi HAMACHI, Akihiko Kondo
article en

Abstract

[Purpose] This study aimed to compare the motor skills of typically developing children with different movement experiences, specifically classical ballet and gymnastics. [Participants and Methods] The participants included 52 typically developing children aged 4-6 years (25 boys and 27 girls) from Kindergarten. The boys engaged in weekly gymnastics and girls engaged in weekly classical ballet under the guidance of specialized instructors. Motor skills were assessed using the 25-m run, tennis ball throw, double-leg continuous jump, and standing long jump tests incorporated in the motor skills test. Balance ability was evaluated using static standing tests with eyes open and closed on a firm floor and foam rubber pad, each for 30 s. The total locus length and circumferential area were calculated. [Results] The boys demonstrated significantly greater throwing distance in tennis ball throws and superior performance in the standing long jump than girls. In the balance test, girls exhibited greater stability than boys in the static standing with eyes open on firm as well as foam rubber pad conditions, as measured by the total locus length. In addition, girls in the following test conditions had smaller circumferential areas than boys: static standing with eyes open and closed on a firm floor and static standing with eyes closed on a foam rubber pad. [Conclusion] These findings suggest that early childhood motor skills vary according to the type of movement experienced.

Journal of Physical Therapy ScienceVol. 37(8)
Kyushu Sangyo University (JP), Fukuoka University (JP), Awadhesh Pratap Singh University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Children's Physical and Motor Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.