ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BETWEEN CRIMINAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND THE DIFFICULTY OF ATTRIBUTION (MEDICAL ROBOT AS A CASE STUDY)

AI entities, particularly medical robots, face a fundamental challenge in criminal accountability: the difficulty of attributing criminal error to a specific entity when harm occurs to a patient. When AI algorithms make an incorrect treatment decision that leads to health complications or death, it is difficult to easily determine whether the error was the result of a programming error, poor device maintenance, or even human misuse. The criminal liability of AI entities, particularly medical robots, hinges on the issue of whether these entities have legal personality. This remains controversial in jurisprudence, given the absence of legislation. In this context, the human agent theory has emerged, according to which criminal liability is distributed among the manufacturer, programmer, and user of AI entities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
BAU Journal - Journal of Legal Studies - مجلة الدراسات القانونية
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54729/2958-4884.1136
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BETWEEN CRIMINAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND THE DIFFICULTY OF ATTRIBUTION (MEDICAL ROBOT AS A CASE STUDY)

Malak Daakour
BAU Journal - Journal of Legal Studies - مجلة الدراسات القانونية
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BETWEEN CRIMINAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND THE DIFFICULTY OF ATTRIBUTION (MEDICAL ROBOT AS A CASE STUDY)

Malak Daakour
article en

Abstract

AI entities, particularly medical robots, face a fundamental challenge in criminal accountability: the difficulty of attributing criminal error to a specific entity when harm occurs to a patient. When AI algorithms make an incorrect treatment decision that leads to health complications or death, it is difficult to easily determine whether the error was the result of a programming error, poor device maintenance, or even human misuse. The criminal liability of AI entities, particularly medical robots, hinges on the issue of whether these entities have legal personality. This remains controversial in jurisprudence, given the absence of legislation. In this context, the human agent theory has emerged, according to which criminal liability is distributed among the manufacturer, programmer, and user of AI entities.

BAU Journal - Journal of Legal Studies - مجلة الدراسات القانونيةVol. 2024(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.