Creative Destruction and Technological Paradigms in Manufacturing: A Large-Scale Review and Framework for Technology Portfolio Assessment

Manufacturing digitalization and automation research has expanded rapidly over the past decades. However, the current literature often presents fragmented views, lacking a comprehensive understanding of its evolution. Due to the vast number of publications, traditional literature reviews are impractical for broad fields like manufacturing digitalization and automation. This study leverages recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI), Large Language Models (LLMs), and Natural Language Processing (NLP) to analyze 31,914 scientific papers from 1970 to 2023, providing a knowledge structure of the field. Moreover, we provide a roadmap of the field's evolution using Dynamic Topic Modeling (DTM). We note emerging trends in energy efficiency (since 2004), composite materials (2006), cybersecurity (2008), robotics (2014), and AI (2016), while simulation, scheduling, and process planning maintain steady and consistent research interests. Additionally, we observe a decay in certain research areas such as manufacturing automation protocol, a once-prominent area in the 1980s introduced by General Motors. We introduce a technology portfolio assessment framework categorizing technologies into Emerging, Established, Experimental, and Decaying quadrants. The proposed framework is based on the findings of this study, technology life cycle, creative destruction, and technological paradigms theories. The findings also offer insights into thematic shifts across the literature, consistent with creative destruction and technological paradigm theories. These findings hold implications for academia, industry, and policymakers, supporting more strategic innovation and resource allocation in the manufacturing sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2025.3592031
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Technology Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creative Destruction and Technological Paradigms in Manufacturing: A Large-Scale Review and Framework for Technology Portfolio Assessment

Lars Håkansson, Muntaser Mohamed Nuttah, Cláudio D. G. Linhares, Hatem Algabroun
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
Technology Assessment and Management
1.30
article

Creative Destruction and Technological Paradigms in Manufacturing: A Large-Scale Review and Framework for Technology Portfolio Assessment

Lars Håkansson, Muntaser Mohamed Nuttah, Cláudio D. G. Linhares, Hatem Algabroun
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Manufacturing digitalization and automation research has expanded rapidly over the past decades. However, the current literature often presents fragmented views, lacking a comprehensive understanding of its evolution. Due to the vast number of publications, traditional literature reviews are impractical for broad fields like manufacturing digitalization and automation. This study leverages recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI), Large Language Models (LLMs), and Natural Language Processing (NLP) to analyze 31,914 scientific papers from 1970 to 2023, providing a knowledge structure of the field. Moreover, we provide a roadmap of the field's evolution using Dynamic Topic Modeling (DTM). We note emerging trends in energy efficiency (since 2004), composite materials (2006), cybersecurity (2008), robotics (2014), and AI (2016), while simulation, scheduling, and process planning maintain steady and consistent research interests. Additionally, we observe a decay in certain research areas such as manufacturing automation protocol, a once-prominent area in the 1980s introduced by General Motors. We introduce a technology portfolio assessment framework categorizing technologies into Emerging, Established, Experimental, and Decaying quadrants. The proposed framework is based on the findings of this study, technology life cycle, creative destruction, and technological paradigms theories. The findings also offer insights into thematic shifts across the literature, consistent with creative destruction and technological paradigm theories. These findings hold implications for academia, industry, and policymakers, supporting more strategic innovation and resource allocation in the manufacturing sector.

IEEE Transactions on Engineering ManagementVol. 72
Linnaeus University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Technology Assessment and Management
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.