Private security training: Comparison of Türkiye and Serbia

Türkiye and Serbia share similarities in various spheres of social life, so we wanted to explore the similarities and differences in the area of private security and, in particular, in private security training. The authors identified several variables, including supervisory bodies, regulations, types of training, field of study / training branch, age of candidates, level of education, training process, mandatory professional exam, authority responsible for the professional exam, possible exceptions to taking the exam, license validity period, and criteria for managers. By applying the method of 'document content analysis' based on a qualitative re-examination design, the authors concluded that there are fewer similarities than expected and many differences in the field of private security training in Türkiye and Serbia. Similarities were observed only in the areas of supervisory bodies, age of candidates, authority responsible for the professional exam, and license validity period, while major differences were observed in all other variables studied. The main reasons for this include different socio-political circumstances, the geopolitical position of the two countries, the presence of terrorism, etc.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bezbednost Beograd
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5937/bezbednost2502113j
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Policing Practices and Perceptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Private security training: Comparison of Türkiye and Serbia

Ali Yağcı, Ali Davut Alkan, Branko Leštanin
1 citations
Bezbednost Beograd
Policing Practices and Perceptions
8.52
article

Private security training: Comparison of Türkiye and Serbia

Ali Yağcı, Ali Davut Alkan, Branko Leštanin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Türkiye and Serbia share similarities in various spheres of social life, so we wanted to explore the similarities and differences in the area of private security and, in particular, in private security training. The authors identified several variables, including supervisory bodies, regulations, types of training, field of study / training branch, age of candidates, level of education, training process, mandatory professional exam, authority responsible for the professional exam, possible exceptions to taking the exam, license validity period, and criteria for managers. By applying the method of 'document content analysis' based on a qualitative re-examination design, the authors concluded that there are fewer similarities than expected and many differences in the field of private security training in Türkiye and Serbia. Similarities were observed only in the areas of supervisory bodies, age of candidates, authority responsible for the professional exam, and license validity period, while major differences were observed in all other variables studied. The main reasons for this include different socio-political circumstances, the geopolitical position of the two countries, the presence of terrorism, etc.

Bezbednost BeogradVol. 67(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Policing Practices and Perceptions
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.