Research and analysis of emergency logistics management and evaluation at home and abroad based on CiteSpace

Using the CiteSpace literature analysis tool, this paper compares domestic and international literature in the field of emergency logistics management and evaluation from dimensions such as keyword centrality, keyword clustering, and keyword time zone maps, analyzing research hot spots and trends in this field. The results indicate that both domestic and international scholars share a common focus on the current research and development status of emergency logistics management. They propose development strategies for emergency logistics management from various perspectives, addressing issues prevalent at the current time node. The difference lies in that international scholars are more dedicated to utilizing intelligent algorithms to establish models and frameworks for emergency logistics management, with research concentrated in science and engineering fields, while there is scant literature discussing emergency logistics evaluation. In contrast, domestic scholars tend to explore relevant theoretical models and management-related topics in this field within the broader context of the current era, evaluating emergency logistics suppliers and focusing on social science domains.