FINANCIAL DIPLOMACY IN THE SPHERE OF INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY RELATIONS

The article examines key aspects of financial diplomacy during the creation and development of the Bretton Woods monetary and financial system (1944–1971) with an emphasis on the participation of the USSR in international negotiations. It analyzes the role of the Soviet delegation headed by M. S. Stepanov in developing the terms of the agreements, including issues of quotas, currency sovereignty, and conditions for participation in the IMF and IBRD. Particular attention is paid to the differences between the positions of the United States, Great Britain, and the USSR, as well as the reasons for the Soviet Union’s refusal to ratify the statutory documents of the Bretton Woods institutions. It shows the diplomatic logic of creating alternative financial mechanisms within the CMEA and the long-term consequences of the USSR’s withdrawal from the Western monetary architecture.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
EKONOMIKA I UPRAVLENIE PROBLEMY RESHENIYA
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2025.07.03.011
Primary Topic
State Capitalism and Financial Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FINANCIAL DIPLOMACY IN THE SPHERE OF INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY RELATIONS

Alexander A. Khandruev, Dzhuletta A. Manukyan
EKONOMIKA I UPRAVLENIE PROBLEMY RESHENIYA
State Capitalism and Financial Governance
article

FINANCIAL DIPLOMACY IN THE SPHERE OF INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY RELATIONS

Alexander A. Khandruev, Dzhuletta A. Manukyan
article en

Abstract

The article examines key aspects of financial diplomacy during the creation and development of the Bretton Woods monetary and financial system (1944–1971) with an emphasis on the participation of the USSR in international negotiations. It analyzes the role of the Soviet delegation headed by M. S. Stepanov in developing the terms of the agreements, including issues of quotas, currency sovereignty, and conditions for participation in the IMF and IBRD. Particular attention is paid to the differences between the positions of the United States, Great Britain, and the USSR, as well as the reasons for the Soviet Union’s refusal to ratify the statutory documents of the Bretton Woods institutions. It shows the diplomatic logic of creating alternative financial mechanisms within the CMEA and the long-term consequences of the USSR’s withdrawal from the Western monetary architecture.

EKONOMIKA I UPRAVLENIE PROBLEMY RESHENIYAVol. 7/3(160)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
State Capitalism and Financial Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.