Understanding the Implementation of Responsible Artificial Intelligence in Organizations: A Neo-Institutional Theory Perspective

The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) systems has raised concerns about their ethical, legal, and social risks. Despite notable progress in the development of responsible AI frameworks, methods, and tools, research shows that many organizations struggle to effectively implement responsible AI. I review prior research on responsible AI to explain the insufficient implementation of responsible AI in organizations. Drawing on neo-institutional theory, I find that policy-practice decoupling (i.e., organizational responsible AI policies are adopted but not implemented in practice) and means-end decoupling (i.e., organizational responsible AI policies are implemented in practice but do not achieve their intended goals) can explain the ineffective implementation of responsible AI, with AI practitioners playing a key role as institutional entrepreneurs or custodians in driving or inhibiting the implementation of responsible AI. I contribute to the literature on responsible AI by exploring the institutional pressures that drive or inhibit its implementation, synthesizing the challenges to its implementation, and providing an overview of the roles and strategies AI practitioners use to deal with the implementation of responsible AI. I propose several avenues for future research and discuss implications for research and practice.

Publication Details

Journal
Communications of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.05708
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the Implementation of Responsible Artificial Intelligence in Organizations: A Neo-Institutional Theory Perspective

1 citations
Communications of the Association for Information Systems
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
2.23
article

Understanding the Implementation of Responsible Artificial Intelligence in Organizations: A Neo-Institutional Theory Perspective

article en
1 citations

Abstract

The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) systems has raised concerns about their ethical, legal, and social risks. Despite notable progress in the development of responsible AI frameworks, methods, and tools, research shows that many organizations struggle to effectively implement responsible AI. I review prior research on responsible AI to explain the insufficient implementation of responsible AI in organizations. Drawing on neo-institutional theory, I find that policy-practice decoupling (i.e., organizational responsible AI policies are adopted but not implemented in practice) and means-end decoupling (i.e., organizational responsible AI policies are implemented in practice but do not achieve their intended goals) can explain the ineffective implementation of responsible AI, with AI practitioners playing a key role as institutional entrepreneurs or custodians in driving or inhibiting the implementation of responsible AI. I contribute to the literature on responsible AI by exploring the institutional pressures that drive or inhibit its implementation, synthesizing the challenges to its implementation, and providing an overview of the roles and strategies AI practitioners use to deal with the implementation of responsible AI. I propose several avenues for future research and discuss implications for research and practice.

Communications of the Association for Information SystemsVol. 57
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.