Understanding pilots’ acceptance to operate in an integrated airspace with crewed and uncrewed aircraft

The safe integration of new and emerging technologies such as remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) into existing airspace will require pilots’ acceptance of such technology. Therefore, the main aim of the present research is to understand pilots’ willingness to operate with crewed and uncrewed aircraft in an integrated airspace. The research also aims to examine whether factors such as vertical separation, automation levels, and technology acceptance affect pilots’ level of airspace integration acceptance. Eighty-five pilots completed a battery of surveys, comprising a demographics questionnaire, a technology acceptance questionnaire, as well as a newly created Aircraft Separation Questionnaire. The results revealed a clear automation acceptance threshold in acceptance between automation levels 3 and 4, the point at which decision-making transitioned from the human to the automation. The analysis found no significant relationship between vertical separation and technology acceptance. These results illustrate that pilots are more receptive towards integrated airspace operations when controlling decisions are undertaken by a human.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drone Systems and Applications
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/dsa-2024-0070
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding pilots’ acceptance to operate in an integrated airspace with crewed and uncrewed aircraft

Brett R. C. Molesworth, D. Vinod
Drone Systems and Applications
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Understanding pilots’ acceptance to operate in an integrated airspace with crewed and uncrewed aircraft

Brett R. C. Molesworth, D. Vinod
article en

Abstract

The safe integration of new and emerging technologies such as remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) into existing airspace will require pilots’ acceptance of such technology. Therefore, the main aim of the present research is to understand pilots’ willingness to operate with crewed and uncrewed aircraft in an integrated airspace. The research also aims to examine whether factors such as vertical separation, automation levels, and technology acceptance affect pilots’ level of airspace integration acceptance. Eighty-five pilots completed a battery of surveys, comprising a demographics questionnaire, a technology acceptance questionnaire, as well as a newly created Aircraft Separation Questionnaire. The results revealed a clear automation acceptance threshold in acceptance between automation levels 3 and 4, the point at which decision-making transitioned from the human to the automation. The analysis found no significant relationship between vertical separation and technology acceptance. These results illustrate that pilots are more receptive towards integrated airspace operations when controlling decisions are undertaken by a human.

Drone Systems and ApplicationsVol. 13
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.