Histopathology Image Enhancement Using Multi‐Resolution Deep Learning Techniques

ABSTRACT Accurate analysis of histopathology images is essential for disease diagnosis and treatment planning. However, the quality of digital pathology slides is often limited by scanner resolution, which can compromise diagnostic precision and patient care. To address this challenge, we conducted a comparative study evaluating four state of the art image enhancement methods: real enhanced super resolution generative adversarial network (Real‐ESRGAN), SwinIR, multi scale image restoration network v2 (MIRNet‐v2) and super resolution CNN (SRCNN). Our assessment focused on both quantitative metrics peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index (SSIM) and qualitative visual analysis to evaluate detail preservation. The experimental results revealed that SwinIR achieved the best quantitative performance among all evaluated methods, attaining the highest PSNR (35.81) and SSIM (0.95) for lung images from the LC2500 dataset at a 2 upscaling factor. In contrast, real‐ESRGAN excelled in perceptual quality, preserving finer image details more effectively, though it recorded slightly lower numerical scores (PSNR: 33.53, SSIM: 0.92) on the same dataset. These outcomes highlight essential trade off between perceptual fidelity and reconstruction quality, indicating that the optimal choice of enhancement method may vary depending on clinical or diagnostic priorities. The MIRNetv2 method delivered reasonable performance but ranked below both real‐ESRGAN and SwinIR. Specifically, it achieved PSNR/SSIM scores of 30.67/0.94 on PR‐IHC patches, 32.90/0.95 on lung images, and 31.87/0.95 on colon images, while scoring 29.11 for PR‐IHC images in a separate evaluation. SRCNN demonstrated a balanced performance across datasets, achieving PSNR/SSIM values of 31.45/0.88 for lung images, 30.76/0.87 for PR‐IHC patches, 32.62/0.93 for colon images, and 33.76/0.91 for PR‐IHC. These findings underscore the real ESRGAN as the most effective method for improving the resolution and quality of histopathology images, supporting its potential integration into digital pathology workflows to enhance diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IET Image Processing
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1049/ipr2.70166
Primary Topic
Advanced Image Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Histopathology Image Enhancement Using Multi‐Resolution Deep Learning Techniques

Mohammad Faizal Ahmad Fauzi, Sarina Binti Mansor, Md Jahid Hasan, Zaka Ur Rehman et al.
IET Image Processing
Advanced Image Processing Techniques
article

Histopathology Image Enhancement Using Multi‐Resolution Deep Learning Techniques

Mohammad Faizal Ahmad Fauzi, Sarina Binti Mansor, Md Jahid Hasan, Zaka Ur Rehman, Meriem Touhami
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Accurate analysis of histopathology images is essential for disease diagnosis and treatment planning. However, the quality of digital pathology slides is often limited by scanner resolution, which can compromise diagnostic precision and patient care. To address this challenge, we conducted a comparative study evaluating four state of the art image enhancement methods: real enhanced super resolution generative adversarial network (Real‐ESRGAN), SwinIR, multi scale image restoration network v2 (MIRNet‐v2) and super resolution CNN (SRCNN). Our assessment focused on both quantitative metrics peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index (SSIM) and qualitative visual analysis to evaluate detail preservation. The experimental results revealed that SwinIR achieved the best quantitative performance among all evaluated methods, attaining the highest PSNR (35.81) and SSIM (0.95) for lung images from the LC2500 dataset at a 2 upscaling factor. In contrast, real‐ESRGAN excelled in perceptual quality, preserving finer image details more effectively, though it recorded slightly lower numerical scores (PSNR: 33.53, SSIM: 0.92) on the same dataset. These outcomes highlight essential trade off between perceptual fidelity and reconstruction quality, indicating that the optimal choice of enhancement method may vary depending on clinical or diagnostic priorities. The MIRNetv2 method delivered reasonable performance but ranked below both real‐ESRGAN and SwinIR. Specifically, it achieved PSNR/SSIM scores of 30.67/0.94 on PR‐IHC patches, 32.90/0.95 on lung images, and 31.87/0.95 on colon images, while scoring 29.11 for PR‐IHC images in a separate evaluation. SRCNN demonstrated a balanced performance across datasets, achieving PSNR/SSIM values of 31.45/0.88 for lung images, 30.76/0.87 for PR‐IHC patches, 32.62/0.93 for colon images, and 33.76/0.91 for PR‐IHC. These findings underscore the real ESRGAN as the most effective method for improving the resolution and quality of histopathology images, supporting its potential integration into digital pathology workflows to enhance diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.

IET Image ProcessingVol. 19(1)
Multimedia University (MY)
Telekom Malaysia Berhad
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Advanced Image Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.