The Influence of Local Cold Application and Resistance Exercise on the mRNA Response of Skeletal Muscle

McGlynn, ML, Rosales, AM, Collins, CW, and Slivka, DR. The influence of local cold application and resistance exercise on the mRNA response of skeletal muscle. J Strength Cond Res 39(11): e1272-e1278, 2025-Cold application post exercise is common practice despite empirical evidence suggesting it impairs muscle growth signaling. Our purpose was to determine the effects of local cold application and resistance exercise on muscle growth/breakdown gene expression. Twelve subjects completed a bilateral resistance exercise bout to volitional fatigue (leg press, leg extension) while wearing a thermal wrap on 1 limb (10° C fluid, EX + COLD) and no wrap contralaterally (EX). Bilateral vastus lateralis biopsies, skin temperature, and intramuscular temperature were collected pre intervention, post resistance exercise (temperatures only), and 4 hours post exercise. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. After 4 hours of cooling, skin ( p < 0.001) and intramuscular temperatures ( p < 0.001) were lower in the EX + COLD (20.4 ± 0.6, 26.1 ± 0.9° C) than in the EX limb (31.7 ± 0.6, 35.1 ± 0.3° C). Despite these temperature decreases, local cooling did not differentially influence myogenic and proteolytic gene expression ( p > 0.05). Resistance exercise was the primary influence on gene expression change. Favorable myogenic gene expression changes were exhibited by Myogenin (increase, p = 0.007), Myogenic Factor 6 (increase, p = 0.002), and Myostatin (decrease, p < 0.001). However, myogenic gene Myogenic Factor 5 decreased ( p < 0.001). All other myogenic genes went unchanged (Myogenic Differentiation 1 , p = 0.665; Myocyte Enhance Factor 2a , p = 0.074; Ribosomal Protein S3 , p = 0.773; Ribosomal Protein L3-Like , p = 0.118). Proteolytic gene expression changes were exhibited by Muscle Unique Ring Finger 1 (increase, p = 0.002) and Atrogin-1 (decrease, p = 0.020). However, F-box protein 32 went unchanged ( p = 0.980). Local cooling may be paired with a resistance exercise bout because of minimal influence after 4 hours of cooling on skeletal muscle growth/breakdown mRNA signaling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005209
Primary Topic
Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of Local Cold Application and Resistance Exercise on the mRNA Response of Skeletal Muscle

Dustin Russel Slivka, Christopher W. Collins, Alejandro M. Rosales, Mark L. McGlynn
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
article

The Influence of Local Cold Application and Resistance Exercise on the mRNA Response of Skeletal Muscle

Dustin Russel Slivka, Christopher W. Collins, Alejandro M. Rosales, Mark L. McGlynn
article en

Abstract

McGlynn, ML, Rosales, AM, Collins, CW, and Slivka, DR. The influence of local cold application and resistance exercise on the mRNA response of skeletal muscle. J Strength Cond Res 39(11): e1272-e1278, 2025-Cold application post exercise is common practice despite empirical evidence suggesting it impairs muscle growth signaling. Our purpose was to determine the effects of local cold application and resistance exercise on muscle growth/breakdown gene expression. Twelve subjects completed a bilateral resistance exercise bout to volitional fatigue (leg press, leg extension) while wearing a thermal wrap on 1 limb (10° C fluid, EX + COLD) and no wrap contralaterally (EX). Bilateral vastus lateralis biopsies, skin temperature, and intramuscular temperature were collected pre intervention, post resistance exercise (temperatures only), and 4 hours post exercise. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. After 4 hours of cooling, skin ( p < 0.001) and intramuscular temperatures ( p < 0.001) were lower in the EX + COLD (20.4 ± 0.6, 26.1 ± 0.9° C) than in the EX limb (31.7 ± 0.6, 35.1 ± 0.3° C). Despite these temperature decreases, local cooling did not differentially influence myogenic and proteolytic gene expression ( p > 0.05). Resistance exercise was the primary influence on gene expression change. Favorable myogenic gene expression changes were exhibited by Myogenin (increase, p = 0.007), Myogenic Factor 6 (increase, p = 0.002), and Myostatin (decrease, p < 0.001). However, myogenic gene Myogenic Factor 5 decreased ( p < 0.001). All other myogenic genes went unchanged (Myogenic Differentiation 1 , p = 0.665; Myocyte Enhance Factor 2a , p = 0.074; Ribosomal Protein S3 , p = 0.773; Ribosomal Protein L3-Like , p = 0.118). Proteolytic gene expression changes were exhibited by Muscle Unique Ring Finger 1 (increase, p = 0.002) and Atrogin-1 (decrease, p = 0.020). However, F-box protein 32 went unchanged ( p = 0.980). Local cooling may be paired with a resistance exercise bout because of minimal influence after 4 hours of cooling on skeletal muscle growth/breakdown mRNA signaling.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning ResearchVol. 39(11)
University of Nebraska at Omaha (US), University of Montana (US)
National Strength and Conditioning Association, National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.