The use of psychoactive drugs and driving – a return to rationality

The relationship between psychoactive drugs and the right to drive is complex and requires a nuanced assessment. Sim­plis­tic criminalization, influenced by political narratives and social stigma, ignores the legitimate medical context. Although these drugs can affect cognitive and motor func­tions, their impact varies depending on dosage, tolerance and use (therapeutic, recreational or abusive). Strict re­gu­la­tions can discourage appropriate treatment and amplify so­cial inequities. Objective assessments of driving ability are recommended, instead of decisions based solely on the pre­sence of the substance in the body. Policies should be based on scientific evidence, balancing road safety with ac­cess to essential treatments, through education and coun­seling. The overall objective was to outline a rational pic­ture of the link between psychoactive medication and the right to drive; in this regard, we conducted a narrative re­view that included 83 articles. The selection was based on content analysis following the essential landmarks of the researched problem: medication classification, types of con­sum­ption, influencing the ability to drive, categories of pa­tients with improvements in abilities in the presence of these treatments, social effects of public narratives, effects of incriminating norms, social responsibility of decision-ma­kers and professionals, practical assessment of cognitive, mo­tor and reaction abilities. The responsibility of politicians and health professionals is essential in developing evi­dence-based policies that promote road safety without com­pro­mi­sing access to necessary treatments. A balanced approach, which includes public education and counseling, is essential to protect patients’ rights and ensure fair regulation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Medic ro
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26416/med.163.1.2025.10652
Primary Topic
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The use of psychoactive drugs and driving – a return to rationality

Radu Dumitrescu
Medic ro
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
article

The use of psychoactive drugs and driving – a return to rationality

Radu Dumitrescu
article en

Abstract

The relationship between psychoactive drugs and the right to drive is complex and requires a nuanced assessment. Sim­plis­tic criminalization, influenced by political narratives and social stigma, ignores the legitimate medical context. Although these drugs can affect cognitive and motor func­tions, their impact varies depending on dosage, tolerance and use (therapeutic, recreational or abusive). Strict re­gu­la­tions can discourage appropriate treatment and amplify so­cial inequities. Objective assessments of driving ability are recommended, instead of decisions based solely on the pre­sence of the substance in the body. Policies should be based on scientific evidence, balancing road safety with ac­cess to essential treatments, through education and coun­seling. The overall objective was to outline a rational pic­ture of the link between psychoactive medication and the right to drive; in this regard, we conducted a narrative re­view that included 83 articles. The selection was based on content analysis following the essential landmarks of the researched problem: medication classification, types of con­sum­ption, influencing the ability to drive, categories of pa­tients with improvements in abilities in the presence of these treatments, social effects of public narratives, effects of incriminating norms, social responsibility of decision-ma­kers and professionals, practical assessment of cognitive, mo­tor and reaction abilities. The responsibility of politicians and health professionals is essential in developing evi­dence-based policies that promote road safety without com­pro­mi­sing access to necessary treatments. A balanced approach, which includes public education and counseling, is essential to protect patients’ rights and ensure fair regulation.

Medic roVol. 163(1)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.