Extroversion/Introversion personality trait and language proficiency; success and failure: voices from students of medical sciences

Background: There are two major personality types in the worldview of social life. The first is an outgoing person who easily blends in with the community, commonly termed an extrovert. In contrast, a second type is a person who chooses to interact or communicate with certain people and takes a long time to blend in, termed an introvert. Methods: The current mixed methods study included 277 students of medical sciences, who completed two questionnaires and participated in a semi-structured interview investigating participants’ traits toward language learning. The current study used a Student Information Questionnaire (SIQ), the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ), language proficiency test scores of the English Bridge Course, and a semi-structured interview. Results: Extrovert students outperformed in speaking skills with a mean difference of P<0.001. Introverts did slightly better in reading and listening skills (75.16) than extroverts (51.41), with the mean difference of P<0.001. Writing skills did not show a stronger correlation with either of the traits (63.60) than the extroverts (59.99), however, introverts slightly outperformed and no major difference was found between the extroverts’ and introverts’ comprehensive language proficiency scores, however, the extroverts did relatively better than their counterparts with almost higher mean scores. The EPQ evaluation revealed that out of the total 277 participants, 146 (46%) were extroverts, 105 (36%) were introverts and 26 (18%) showed no considerable inclination towards either personality. Introverts showed higher mean scores for listening skills (75.87) than extroverts (45.90) with a mean difference of P<0.001. Conclusion: This study has contributed to the notion that personality types affect language learning by suggesting that the factor of the type of instruction is a significant role player as well. The findings also verified that selecting a learner-friendly type of instruction in academic settings and at the academic levels might benefit all students, including introverts and extroverts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research and Development in Medical Education
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34172/rdme.025.33243
Primary Topic
Medical Education and Admissions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extroversion/Introversion personality trait and language proficiency; success and failure: voices from students of medical sciences

Beheshteh Shamsaei, Hamid Mahmoodi
Research and Development in Medical Education
Medical Education and Admissions
article

Extroversion/Introversion personality trait and language proficiency; success and failure: voices from students of medical sciences

Beheshteh Shamsaei, Hamid Mahmoodi
article en

Abstract

Background: There are two major personality types in the worldview of social life. The first is an outgoing person who easily blends in with the community, commonly termed an extrovert. In contrast, a second type is a person who chooses to interact or communicate with certain people and takes a long time to blend in, termed an introvert. Methods: The current mixed methods study included 277 students of medical sciences, who completed two questionnaires and participated in a semi-structured interview investigating participants’ traits toward language learning. The current study used a Student Information Questionnaire (SIQ), the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ), language proficiency test scores of the English Bridge Course, and a semi-structured interview. Results: Extrovert students outperformed in speaking skills with a mean difference of P<0.001. Introverts did slightly better in reading and listening skills (75.16) than extroverts (51.41), with the mean difference of P<0.001. Writing skills did not show a stronger correlation with either of the traits (63.60) than the extroverts (59.99), however, introverts slightly outperformed and no major difference was found between the extroverts’ and introverts’ comprehensive language proficiency scores, however, the extroverts did relatively better than their counterparts with almost higher mean scores. The EPQ evaluation revealed that out of the total 277 participants, 146 (46%) were extroverts, 105 (36%) were introverts and 26 (18%) showed no considerable inclination towards either personality. Introverts showed higher mean scores for listening skills (75.87) than extroverts (45.90) with a mean difference of P<0.001. Conclusion: This study has contributed to the notion that personality types affect language learning by suggesting that the factor of the type of instruction is a significant role player as well. The findings also verified that selecting a learner-friendly type of instruction in academic settings and at the academic levels might benefit all students, including introverts and extroverts.

Research and Development in Medical EducationVol. 14
Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Medical Education and Admissions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.