Failure Rates of Two Types of Mini-Screws as Orthodontic Anchors

Background: In orthodontic treatments, mini-screws are used when absolute anchorage is required for tooth movement. In daily clinical practice, it is common to observe mini-screws loosening after implantation. The aim of this clinical trial was to compare the failure rates of Iranian and Korean mini-screws utilized as orthodontic anchorage. Methods: In this study, 74 patients requiring anchorage with mini-screws in the upper jaw were randomly divided into study and control groups receiving Iranian (Poyanteb Company) and Korean (the JEIL brand) mini-screws, respectively. The patients were evaluated for stability or failure of the mini-screws at one week and then at one-, two-, and three-month intervals. Any degree of mobility was considered a failure. The data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA, Bonferroni post hoc test, and t test. Results: There were no significant differences in the stability of Iranian and JEIL brand screws when compared at intervals of one week, one month, two months, and three months (P>0.05). Additionally, no significant differences were found when assessing the stability of Iranian and JEIL brands with 35 mini-screws in the buccal area. Finally, an examination of 39 mini-screws from both brands in the palatal region of the maxilla revealed no statistical differences. Conclusion: In comparing Iranian and JEIL brand mini-screws, no significant difference was observed in the failure rate, with both demonstrating adequate efficiency and stability. Therefore, to reduce costs for patients, Iranian brands can be utilized effectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Avicenna journal of dental research
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34172/ajdr.2111
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Failure Rates of Two Types of Mini-Screws as Orthodontic Anchors

Behnaz Alafchi, Amirfarhang Miresmaeili, Nasrin Farhadian, Anahita Morovat
Avicenna journal of dental research
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Failure Rates of Two Types of Mini-Screws as Orthodontic Anchors

Behnaz Alafchi, Amirfarhang Miresmaeili, Nasrin Farhadian, Anahita Morovat
article en

Abstract

Background: In orthodontic treatments, mini-screws are used when absolute anchorage is required for tooth movement. In daily clinical practice, it is common to observe mini-screws loosening after implantation. The aim of this clinical trial was to compare the failure rates of Iranian and Korean mini-screws utilized as orthodontic anchorage. Methods: In this study, 74 patients requiring anchorage with mini-screws in the upper jaw were randomly divided into study and control groups receiving Iranian (Poyanteb Company) and Korean (the JEIL brand) mini-screws, respectively. The patients were evaluated for stability or failure of the mini-screws at one week and then at one-, two-, and three-month intervals. Any degree of mobility was considered a failure. The data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA, Bonferroni post hoc test, and t test. Results: There were no significant differences in the stability of Iranian and JEIL brand screws when compared at intervals of one week, one month, two months, and three months (P>0.05). Additionally, no significant differences were found when assessing the stability of Iranian and JEIL brands with 35 mini-screws in the buccal area. Finally, an examination of 39 mini-screws from both brands in the palatal region of the maxilla revealed no statistical differences. Conclusion: In comparing Iranian and JEIL brand mini-screws, no significant difference was observed in the failure rate, with both demonstrating adequate efficiency and stability. Therefore, to reduce costs for patients, Iranian brands can be utilized effectively.

Avicenna journal of dental researchVol. 17(2)
Hamedan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Hamadan University of Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.