<b>Rapid, Multi-Sample Assay of Gabapentin in Capsules Using Easy-to-Setup and Low-Cost Smartphone-Based Fluorescence Measurement</b>

Background: Pharmacopeial methods for the quantification of gabapentin (GBP), particularly high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), require costly instrumentation, unsafe solvents in mobile phase, and time-consuming procedures. While fluorometric methods exist, they also employ expensive fluorometers. This study aimed to develop a cost-effective, eco-friendly GBP assay using smartphone-based digital image fluorometry (SDIF) for rapid multi-sample analysis of GBP in pharmaceutical capsules. Methods: GBP was reacted with fluorescamine in borate buffer (pH 9.0) for 2 minutes, producing a blue fluorescent product under UV light. Fluorescence intensity was captured using a smartphone inside a dark box with low-cost UV LEDs (395 nm). GBP concentration was determined from green (G) channel intensity using a logarithmic calibration curve. The method was optimized, validated per USP guidelines, and compared with USP HPLC. Greenness and practicality were evaluated. Results: The SDIF method exhibited excellent linearity (r² = 0.9994) over GBP concentrations of 0.2–4.0 μg/mL, with high accuracy (98%–102% recovery) and precision (RSD &lt; 2%). No interference was observed from capsule excipients or the impurity GBP-related compound A. Assay results showed no significant difference from the USP HPLC method. Compared to HPLC, the SDIF method demonstrated a greener profile by using acetone instead of acetonitrile. Although requiring derivatization and offering lower automation than HPLC, SDIF achieved a satisfactory Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) score of 65.0, indicating practical applicability. Additionally, the method allowed simultaneous measurement of six samples and six standard solutions, unlike HPLC or fluorometers, which measure only one at a time. Conclusion: SDIF eliminates the need for fluorometers or HPLC, using inexpensive and simple equipment for rapid, multi-sample GBP analysis. With its green profile and practicality, SDIF offers a viable alternative for routine quality control, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceutical Sciences
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34172/ps.025.42216
Primary Topic
Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rapid, Multi-Sample Assay of Gabapentin in Capsules Using Easy-to-Setup and Low-Cost Smartphone-Based Fluorescence Measurement

Thapakorn Charoenying, Supusson Pengnam, Tanasait Ngawhirunpat, Thana Thanayutsiri et al.
Pharmaceutical Sciences
Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
article

Rapid, Multi-Sample Assay of Gabapentin in Capsules Using Easy-to-Setup and Low-Cost Smartphone-Based Fluorescence Measurement

Thapakorn Charoenying, Supusson Pengnam, Tanasait Ngawhirunpat, Thana Thanayutsiri, Akhayachatra Chinsriwongkul, Praneet Opanasopit, Theerasak Rojanarata
article en

Abstract

Background: Pharmacopeial methods for the quantification of gabapentin (GBP), particularly high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), require costly instrumentation, unsafe solvents in mobile phase, and time-consuming procedures. While fluorometric methods exist, they also employ expensive fluorometers. This study aimed to develop a cost-effective, eco-friendly GBP assay using smartphone-based digital image fluorometry (SDIF) for rapid multi-sample analysis of GBP in pharmaceutical capsules. Methods: GBP was reacted with fluorescamine in borate buffer (pH 9.0) for 2 minutes, producing a blue fluorescent product under UV light. Fluorescence intensity was captured using a smartphone inside a dark box with low-cost UV LEDs (395 nm). GBP concentration was determined from green (G) channel intensity using a logarithmic calibration curve. The method was optimized, validated per USP guidelines, and compared with USP HPLC. Greenness and practicality were evaluated. Results: The SDIF method exhibited excellent linearity (r² = 0.9994) over GBP concentrations of 0.2–4.0 μg/mL, with high accuracy (98%–102% recovery) and precision (RSD &lt; 2%). No interference was observed from capsule excipients or the impurity GBP-related compound A. Assay results showed no significant difference from the USP HPLC method. Compared to HPLC, the SDIF method demonstrated a greener profile by using acetone instead of acetonitrile. Although requiring derivatization and offering lower automation than HPLC, SDIF achieved a satisfactory Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) score of 65.0, indicating practical applicability. Additionally, the method allowed simultaneous measurement of six samples and six standard solutions, unlike HPLC or fluorometers, which measure only one at a time. Conclusion: SDIF eliminates the need for fluorometers or HPLC, using inexpensive and simple equipment for rapid, multi-sample GBP analysis. With its green profile and practicality, SDIF offers a viable alternative for routine quality control, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Pharmaceutical SciencesVol. 31(3)
Silpakorn University (TH)
Thailand Science Research and Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.