Experience of European Countries in Developing Institutions of Legal Aid and Defense in Criminal Proceedings

The Article Purpose is to clarify peculiari-ties of shaping the European Countries’ expe-rience in developing such criminal procedure institutions as defense and provision of legal aid within criminal proceedings. The author applies general scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, generalization, logical and struc tu-ral, etc.), methods of comparative legal research and system analysis. It has been established that in most European countries the system of criminal procedure legislation is more gener-ally accepted, in contrast to the criminal pro-cedure legislation of Ukraine. Legal profession as a non-governmental institution in France, Germany, Poland, Estonia, etc. also functions in compliance with gene rally accepted tradi-tions that arose as early as the17th-18thcentu-ries. However, such situation does not guaran-tee conformity of human rights activities with established international standards in the field of personal protection from criminal prosecu-tion. It has been observed that activities related to protecting a person in the criminal justice field do not differ fundamentally in different countries. What is more, requirements for de-fender counsels provided by the current legis-lation of Ukraine are, in certain aspects, more stringent than, for example, in France and Germany. At present it is important to identify typical mistakes that occur in the activities of law enforcement agencies and defense counsel at the pre-trial investigation stage and signifi-cantly impact the violation of international principles regarding protection from criminal prose cution.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.3.2024.10
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experience of European Countries in Developing Institutions of Legal Aid and Defense in Criminal Proceedings

Mykola Kolomoitsev
Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics
European and International Law Studies
article

Experience of European Countries in Developing Institutions of Legal Aid and Defense in Criminal Proceedings

Mykola Kolomoitsev
article en

Abstract

The Article Purpose is to clarify peculiari-ties of shaping the European Countries’ expe-rience in developing such criminal procedure institutions as defense and provision of legal aid within criminal proceedings. The author applies general scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, generalization, logical and struc tu-ral, etc.), methods of comparative legal research and system analysis. It has been established that in most European countries the system of criminal procedure legislation is more gener-ally accepted, in contrast to the criminal pro-cedure legislation of Ukraine. Legal profession as a non-governmental institution in France, Germany, Poland, Estonia, etc. also functions in compliance with gene rally accepted tradi-tions that arose as early as the17th-18thcentu-ries. However, such situation does not guaran-tee conformity of human rights activities with established international standards in the field of personal protection from criminal prosecu-tion. It has been observed that activities related to protecting a person in the criminal justice field do not differ fundamentally in different countries. What is more, requirements for de-fender counsels provided by the current legis-lation of Ukraine are, in certain aspects, more stringent than, for example, in France and Germany. At present it is important to identify typical mistakes that occur in the activities of law enforcement agencies and defense counsel at the pre-trial investigation stage and signifi-cantly impact the violation of international principles regarding protection from criminal prose cution.

Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and CriminalisticsVol. 36(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.