STUDI KOMPARATIF CENDIKIAWAN MUSLIM KLASIK DAN KONTEMPROR DALAM PEMBENTUKAN KONSEP DAN PRINSIP MAQASID AL-SYARIAH

. This study will analyze the methodology used by classical Islamic scholars in determining the concept and principles of maqāṣid alshariah. This analysis will compare the method of determining Maqasid Shariah by Muslim scholars with current scientific research methods. This research uses qualitative methodology by reviewing classical and modern scientific writings. The collected data is analyzed thematically based on inductive approach. The results of this study show that the formulation of the concept and principles of Maqasid Sharia involves the analysis of textual commands. The inductive reasoning of istiqrā' applied by Muslim scholars has similarities with thematic analysis in modern qualitative research. The results suggest basing ijtihad and fatwa on maqāṣid al-shariah through holistic textual analysis. This makes it possible to respond to new challenges through appropriate sharia laws by avoiding rigid legalism or unbridled rationalism.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
I’tiqadiah Jurnal Hukum dan Ilmu-ilmu Kesyariahan
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63424/itiqadiah.v1i3.123
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

STUDI KOMPARATIF CENDIKIAWAN MUSLIM KLASIK DAN KONTEMPROR DALAM PEMBENTUKAN KONSEP DAN PRINSIP MAQASID AL-SYARIAH

Sawaluddin Siregar, Ahmad Burhanuddin
I’tiqadiah Jurnal Hukum dan Ilmu-ilmu Kesyariahan
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
article

STUDI KOMPARATIF CENDIKIAWAN MUSLIM KLASIK DAN KONTEMPROR DALAM PEMBENTUKAN KONSEP DAN PRINSIP MAQASID AL-SYARIAH

Sawaluddin Siregar, Ahmad Burhanuddin
article en

Abstract

. This study will analyze the methodology used by classical Islamic scholars in determining the concept and principles of maqāṣid alshariah. This analysis will compare the method of determining Maqasid Shariah by Muslim scholars with current scientific research methods. This research uses qualitative methodology by reviewing classical and modern scientific writings. The collected data is analyzed thematically based on inductive approach. The results of this study show that the formulation of the concept and principles of Maqasid Sharia involves the analysis of textual commands. The inductive reasoning of istiqrā' applied by Muslim scholars has similarities with thematic analysis in modern qualitative research. The results suggest basing ijtihad and fatwa on maqāṣid al-shariah through holistic textual analysis. This makes it possible to respond to new challenges through appropriate sharia laws by avoiding rigid legalism or unbridled rationalism.

I’tiqadiah Jurnal Hukum dan Ilmu-ilmu KesyariahanVol. 1(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.