Undetermined: Free will in real time and through time

In his book Determined, Robert Sapolsky argues that our cognitive systems are effectively deterministic, such that a preconfigured algorithm will inevitably spit out a single answer for what to do in every scenario we encounter, leaving nothing in that process “up to us”. A more realistic view of the psychology and neuroscience of decision-making undermines this deterministic impression and highlights instead how our cognitive processes are designed to “tune the algorithm” on the fly, precisely so that we can figure out what to do in novel scenarios where all of the contextual relations could not possibly be prestated. Carrying out these cognitive processes – by operating over meaningful patterns of neural activity, figuring the relative salience of various parameters, in a highly contextual and holistic manner, for person-level reasons, as best we can with incomplete, uncertain information and noisy components – just is us deciding what to do. This also undermines the argument that we have no control over how our neural or cognitive systems come to be configured at any moment. Some of the choices we make are about our own cognition and motivations: we shape our own character through time in ways that enable us to act as ourselves in real-time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teorema
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30827/trif.34308
Primary Topic
Free Will and Agency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Undetermined: Free will in real time and through time

Kevin J. Mitchell
Teorema
Free Will and Agency
article

Undetermined: Free will in real time and through time

Kevin J. Mitchell
article en

Abstract

In his book Determined, Robert Sapolsky argues that our cognitive systems are effectively deterministic, such that a preconfigured algorithm will inevitably spit out a single answer for what to do in every scenario we encounter, leaving nothing in that process “up to us”. A more realistic view of the psychology and neuroscience of decision-making undermines this deterministic impression and highlights instead how our cognitive processes are designed to “tune the algorithm” on the fly, precisely so that we can figure out what to do in novel scenarios where all of the contextual relations could not possibly be prestated. Carrying out these cognitive processes – by operating over meaningful patterns of neural activity, figuring the relative salience of various parameters, in a highly contextual and holistic manner, for person-level reasons, as best we can with incomplete, uncertain information and noisy components – just is us deciding what to do. This also undermines the argument that we have no control over how our neural or cognitive systems come to be configured at any moment. Some of the choices we make are about our own cognition and motivations: we shape our own character through time in ways that enable us to act as ourselves in real-time.

TeoremaVol. 44(1)
Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Free Will and Agency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.