Crisis and “Institutional Hubbing” in the European Union

ABSTRACT This study asks how crisis affects institutional designs and offers a study of crisis coordination mechanisms in the European Union (EU). Studies have suggested that crisis tends to strengthen the role of the member states in the EU. New intergovernmentalist literature in particular suggests that member states take a leading role in dealing with crises through consensus‐seeking deliberation in search for common solutions. Our study challenges this argument by identifying how crises lead to a de facto strengthening of the executive authority of the Commission by “hubbing” meso‐level hybrid coordination mechanisms. The article sides with institutionalist literature arguing that the rise of new coordination instruments in the EU enables the Commission to leverage its executive power. The data demonstrate an extensive growth of hybrid coordination mechanisms which has increased the agenda setting, coordinating, and implementing role of the Commission, which is conducive to crisis‐induced strengthening of executive power of the Commission.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.70019
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crisis and “Institutional Hubbing” in the European Union

Marianne Riddervold, Jarle Trondal, Stian Reme Abrahamsen
Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy
European Union Policy and Governance
article

Crisis and “Institutional Hubbing” in the European Union

Marianne Riddervold, Jarle Trondal, Stian Reme Abrahamsen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study asks how crisis affects institutional designs and offers a study of crisis coordination mechanisms in the European Union (EU). Studies have suggested that crisis tends to strengthen the role of the member states in the EU. New intergovernmentalist literature in particular suggests that member states take a leading role in dealing with crises through consensus‐seeking deliberation in search for common solutions. Our study challenges this argument by identifying how crises lead to a de facto strengthening of the executive authority of the Commission by “hubbing” meso‐level hybrid coordination mechanisms. The article sides with institutionalist literature arguing that the rise of new coordination instruments in the EU enables the Commission to leverage its executive power. The data demonstrate an extensive growth of hybrid coordination mechanisms which has increased the agenda setting, coordinating, and implementing role of the Commission, which is conducive to crisis‐induced strengthening of executive power of the Commission.

Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public PolicyVol. 16(3)
Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NO), OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), University of Oslo (NO), University of Agder (NO), Institute for the International Education of Students (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.