Representing provenance and track changes of cultural heritage metadata in RDF: a survey of existing approaches

Abstract In the realm of Digital Humanities, the management of cultural heritage metadata is pivotal for ensuring data trustworthiness. Provenance information—contextual metadata detailing the origin and history of data—plays a crucial role in this process. However, tracking provenance and changes in metadata using the Resource Description Framework (RDF) presents significant challenges due to the limitations of foundational Semantic Web technologies. This article offers a comprehensive review of existing models and approaches for representing provenance and tracking changes in RDF, with a specific focus on cultural heritage metadata. It examines W3C standard proposals such as RDF Reification and n-ary relations, along with various alternative systems. Through an in-depth analysis, the study identifies Named Graphs, RDF-star, the Provenance Ontology (PROV-O), Dublin Core (DC), Conjectural Graphs, and the OpenCitations Data Model (OCDM) as the most effective solutions. These models are evaluated based on their compliance with RDF standards, scalability, and applicability across different domains. The findings underscore the importance of selecting the appropriate model to ensure robust and reliable management of provenance in RDF datasets, thereby contributing to the ongoing discourse on provenance representation in the Digital Humanities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Scholarship in the Humanities
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaf076
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Representing provenance and track changes of cultural heritage metadata in RDF: a survey of existing approaches

Ivan Heibi, Francesca Tomasi, Silvio Peroni, Arcangelo Massari
2 citations
Digital Scholarship in the Humanities
Scientific Computing and Data Management
8.34
article

Representing provenance and track changes of cultural heritage metadata in RDF: a survey of existing approaches

Ivan Heibi, Francesca Tomasi, Silvio Peroni, Arcangelo Massari
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In the realm of Digital Humanities, the management of cultural heritage metadata is pivotal for ensuring data trustworthiness. Provenance information—contextual metadata detailing the origin and history of data—plays a crucial role in this process. However, tracking provenance and changes in metadata using the Resource Description Framework (RDF) presents significant challenges due to the limitations of foundational Semantic Web technologies. This article offers a comprehensive review of existing models and approaches for representing provenance and tracking changes in RDF, with a specific focus on cultural heritage metadata. It examines W3C standard proposals such as RDF Reification and n-ary relations, along with various alternative systems. Through an in-depth analysis, the study identifies Named Graphs, RDF-star, the Provenance Ontology (PROV-O), Dublin Core (DC), Conjectural Graphs, and the OpenCitations Data Model (OCDM) as the most effective solutions. These models are evaluated based on their compliance with RDF standards, scalability, and applicability across different domains. The findings underscore the importance of selecting the appropriate model to ensure robust and reliable management of provenance in RDF datasets, thereby contributing to the ongoing discourse on provenance representation in the Digital Humanities.

Digital Scholarship in the Humanities
University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Scientific Computing and Data Management
8.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.