The International Peace Movement and the Labor Movement, 1889–1914: Agency and Relationships in the Peace Struggle

ABSTRACT Between 1889 and 1914, the international peace movement and the labor movement shared goals of preventing war and promoting justice, but their collaboration was constrained by differing class compositions and priorities. While the peace movement, led largely by middle‐class reformers, emphasized arbitration and disarmament, the labor movement, grounded in the working class, prioritized class struggle and systemic change. These social and ideological divides shaped their strategies and mutual perceptions, limiting their ability to work together. Focusing on the liberal International Peace Bureau (IPB) and its relations to the labor movement and its organizations, this study examines how rising militarism and class conflict deepened these tensions, highlighting the complexities of uniting liberal and socialist peace agendas, even during a period of a growing arms race.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Peace &amp Change
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/pech.70026
Primary Topic
Race, History, and American Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The International Peace Movement and the Labor Movement, 1889–1914: Agency and Relationships in the Peace Struggle

Fredrik Egefur
1 links
Peace &amp Change
Race, History, and American Society
article

The International Peace Movement and the Labor Movement, 1889–1914: Agency and Relationships in the Peace Struggle

Fredrik Egefur
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Between 1889 and 1914, the international peace movement and the labor movement shared goals of preventing war and promoting justice, but their collaboration was constrained by differing class compositions and priorities. While the peace movement, led largely by middle‐class reformers, emphasized arbitration and disarmament, the labor movement, grounded in the working class, prioritized class struggle and systemic change. These social and ideological divides shaped their strategies and mutual perceptions, limiting their ability to work together. Focusing on the liberal International Peace Bureau (IPB) and its relations to the labor movement and its organizations, this study examines how rising militarism and class conflict deepened these tensions, highlighting the complexities of uniting liberal and socialist peace agendas, even during a period of a growing arms race.

Peace &amp ChangeVol. 51(1)
Malmö University (SE), Lund University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Race, History, and American Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.