Review of Robert Pippin’s The Culmination: Heidegger, German Idealism, and the Fate of Philosophy

After helping to inaugurate the Anglophone Hegelian revival, Pippin offers a striking reassessment of that revival in The Culmination: Heidegger, German Idealism, and the Fate of Philosophy. Pippin’s main claim is that Heidegger “understood the Idealist tradition and its significance better than anyone had hitherto.” However, this claim overlooks the depth of Schelling’s understanding of German idealism and the strength of his critique of Hegel. Schelling mounts a formidable critique of Hegel that anticipates crucial aspects of Heidegger’s critique, including aspects missing from Pippin’s account. I rehearse the development of Pippin’s pursuit of a defensible account of Hegel’s argument for the speculative identity of thought and being. I then present Pippin’s post-idealist turn in The Culmination by summarizing the book. Finally, I demarcate the Schellingian lacuna in Pippin’s endorsement of Heidegger’s critique of Hegel.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5840/gfpj20254618
Primary Topic
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review of Robert Pippin’s The Culmination: Heidegger, German Idealism, and the Fate of Philosophy

G. Anthony Bruno
1 links
Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
article

Review of Robert Pippin’s The Culmination: Heidegger, German Idealism, and the Fate of Philosophy

G. Anthony Bruno
article en

Abstract

After helping to inaugurate the Anglophone Hegelian revival, Pippin offers a striking reassessment of that revival in The Culmination: Heidegger, German Idealism, and the Fate of Philosophy. Pippin’s main claim is that Heidegger “understood the Idealist tradition and its significance better than anyone had hitherto.” However, this claim overlooks the depth of Schelling’s understanding of German idealism and the strength of his critique of Hegel. Schelling mounts a formidable critique of Hegel that anticipates crucial aspects of Heidegger’s critique, including aspects missing from Pippin’s account. I rehearse the development of Pippin’s pursuit of a defensible account of Hegel’s argument for the speculative identity of thought and being. I then present Pippin’s post-idealist turn in The Culmination by summarizing the book. Finally, I demarcate the Schellingian lacuna in Pippin’s endorsement of Heidegger’s critique of Hegel.

Graduate Faculty Philosophy JournalVol. 46(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Review of Robert Pippin’s The Culmination: Heidegger, German Idealism, and the Fate of Philosophy — G. Anthony Bruno · Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS