The wildlife strikes back: determining the secondary strike risk associated with a mammal–aircraft collision

Abstract Wildlife–aircraft collisions are becoming increasingly common and pose a serious threat to the global aviation industry. While wildlife strike mitigation is a well‐researched area, often focusing on a specific species or taxonomic group, secondary strike risk with scavenger or predatory species is rarely considered within the literature. Dublin Airport is the largest civil airport in the Republic of Ireland, reporting an average of 23.9 (±12.8 SD) strikes with native Irish hares ( Lepus timidus hibernicus ) annually. We employed motion‐activated camera traps to identify the species attracted to simulated hare‐strike events and to record the time to initial carcass detection. We used commercially available rat carcasses as a proxy for hare carcasses to assess the secondary strike risk associated with such events. We recorded 542 detections within 24 hours of carcass deployment from 82 trials. Hooded crows ( Corvus cornix ) were the most frequently detected species, involved in 86% of interactions. Initial carcass detection took an average of 4 hours and 54 minutes for avian species, with birds spending an average of 5 minutes and 29 seconds with a carcass. In comparison, it took mammal species an average of 9 hours and 32 minutes to detect the carcass in the first instance. Mammals remained with the carcass for an average of 2 minutes and 35 seconds. These data indicate that current clean‐up practices at Dublin Airport (i.e., immediate clean‐up and closing of the runway to facilitate clean‐up operations) are adequate for reducing the likelihood of a secondary strike event.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wildlife Management
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.70071
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The wildlife strikes back: determining the secondary strike risk associated with a mammal–aircraft collision

Gerry Keogh, Anthony Caravaggi, Fidelma Butler, Samantha Ball et al.
Journal of Wildlife Management
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

The wildlife strikes back: determining the secondary strike risk associated with a mammal–aircraft collision

Gerry Keogh, Anthony Caravaggi, Fidelma Butler, Samantha Ball, Thomas C. Kelly
article en

Abstract

Abstract Wildlife–aircraft collisions are becoming increasingly common and pose a serious threat to the global aviation industry. While wildlife strike mitigation is a well‐researched area, often focusing on a specific species or taxonomic group, secondary strike risk with scavenger or predatory species is rarely considered within the literature. Dublin Airport is the largest civil airport in the Republic of Ireland, reporting an average of 23.9 (±12.8 SD) strikes with native Irish hares ( Lepus timidus hibernicus ) annually. We employed motion‐activated camera traps to identify the species attracted to simulated hare‐strike events and to record the time to initial carcass detection. We used commercially available rat carcasses as a proxy for hare carcasses to assess the secondary strike risk associated with such events. We recorded 542 detections within 24 hours of carcass deployment from 82 trials. Hooded crows ( Corvus cornix ) were the most frequently detected species, involved in 86% of interactions. Initial carcass detection took an average of 4 hours and 54 minutes for avian species, with birds spending an average of 5 minutes and 29 seconds with a carcass. In comparison, it took mammal species an average of 9 hours and 32 minutes to detect the carcass in the first instance. Mammals remained with the carcass for an average of 2 minutes and 35 seconds. These data indicate that current clean‐up practices at Dublin Airport (i.e., immediate clean‐up and closing of the runway to facilitate clean‐up operations) are adequate for reducing the likelihood of a secondary strike event.

Journal of Wildlife ManagementVol. 89(7)
University of South Wales (GB), University College Cork (IE), Manchester Airport (GB), Technological University Dublin (IE)
University College Cork, Irish Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.