Development and validation of the laziness assessment scale

Laziness, a behavioural construct with implications in psychological, social, and organizational contexts, has garnered attention owing to its impact on human functioning. Limited research has explored how this construct affects individuals' functioning as the subjective nature of laziness necessitates a reliable measurement tool. This study addresses this gap by developing and validating a Laziness Assessment Scale to measure laziness levels, thus addressing the absence of a standardized tool across diverse populations. A three-stage process was developed and validated using the Laziness Assessment Scale (LAS). Data were collected from 2493 students, workers, and managers from various sectors of Southeast Nigeria. Expert evaluation establishes face and content validity. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of 1920 participants and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of 336 participants revealed a one-factor, 9-item structure. A study of 237 participants validated the construct validity of the 9-item scale. Factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, and Pearson's coefficient were used to assess factor structure, reliability, and validity indices. The scale demonstrated strong reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of .91 and split-half reliability of .86. For concurrent validity, the scale correlated positively with procrastination, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, depression, and external locus of control and negatively with conscientiousness and assertiveness for predictive validity. These findings indicate that the LAS exhibits strong psychometric properties, validating its effectiveness in capturing variations in laziness. This study has implications for individual assessments because understanding laziness levels can inform interventions to enhance productivity across populations owing to the impact of laziness on health behaviours, well-being, and productivity outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101852
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of the laziness assessment scale

Euckie U. Immanuel, Obinna O. Ike
1 citations
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Behavioral Health and Interventions
1.54
article

Development and validation of the laziness assessment scale

Euckie U. Immanuel, Obinna O. Ike
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Laziness, a behavioural construct with implications in psychological, social, and organizational contexts, has garnered attention owing to its impact on human functioning. Limited research has explored how this construct affects individuals' functioning as the subjective nature of laziness necessitates a reliable measurement tool. This study addresses this gap by developing and validating a Laziness Assessment Scale to measure laziness levels, thus addressing the absence of a standardized tool across diverse populations. A three-stage process was developed and validated using the Laziness Assessment Scale (LAS). Data were collected from 2493 students, workers, and managers from various sectors of Southeast Nigeria. Expert evaluation establishes face and content validity. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of 1920 participants and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of 336 participants revealed a one-factor, 9-item structure. A study of 237 participants validated the construct validity of the 9-item scale. Factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, and Pearson's coefficient were used to assess factor structure, reliability, and validity indices. The scale demonstrated strong reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of .91 and split-half reliability of .86. For concurrent validity, the scale correlated positively with procrastination, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, depression, and external locus of control and negatively with conscientiousness and assertiveness for predictive validity. These findings indicate that the LAS exhibits strong psychometric properties, validating its effectiveness in capturing variations in laziness. This study has implications for individual assessments because understanding laziness levels can inform interventions to enhance productivity across populations owing to the impact of laziness on health behaviours, well-being, and productivity outcomes.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 12
University of Nigeria (NG)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
1.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.