Students’ perception of assessment practices and academic performance in Science

This study explored how Grade 10 Science, Technology, and Engineering (STE) students perceive assessment practices in science and how these perceptions relate to their academic performance. The research aimed to answer questions about students’ personal profiles (age, gender, parents’ educational attainment, and family income), their science performance, their perceptions of assessment practices in terms of relevance, quality, and motivation, and the connections between these factors. Through surveys and second-quarter science scores, the study found that students generally had a positive opinion of the assessment practices. They described the assessments as engaging, well-structured, and closely connected to their lessons. However, most students only achieved “Satisfactory” scores, showing that there is still room for academic improvement.No student scored in the “Excellent” range, and a small number fell into the “Needs Improvement” category. The study also revealed no significant differences in students’ perceptions of assessment practices based on their profiles, such as age or gender. Students had positive views of the assessments, but these did not strongly affect their performance in science. The weak negative link suggests that other factors, like learning styles or outside influences, may play a bigger role in their success. Based on the findings, the study recommends improving assessment practices by including activities that build critical thinking skills. Extra support, such as tutoring or remedial lessons, or interventions can help struggling students improve. Giving clear feedback and adjusting teaching methods to meet theneeds of the students can make learning more effective. Regularly reviewing assessments is also important to keep improving the learning process.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Pantao, international journal of the humanities and social sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69651/pijhss0403310
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Students’ perception of assessment practices and academic performance in Science

Honey Grace Luna, Renalyn Capundan
Pantao, international journal of the humanities and social sciences
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Students’ perception of assessment practices and academic performance in Science

Honey Grace Luna, Renalyn Capundan
article en

Abstract

This study explored how Grade 10 Science, Technology, and Engineering (STE) students perceive assessment practices in science and how these perceptions relate to their academic performance. The research aimed to answer questions about students’ personal profiles (age, gender, parents’ educational attainment, and family income), their science performance, their perceptions of assessment practices in terms of relevance, quality, and motivation, and the connections between these factors. Through surveys and second-quarter science scores, the study found that students generally had a positive opinion of the assessment practices. They described the assessments as engaging, well-structured, and closely connected to their lessons. However, most students only achieved “Satisfactory” scores, showing that there is still room for academic improvement.No student scored in the “Excellent” range, and a small number fell into the “Needs Improvement” category. The study also revealed no significant differences in students’ perceptions of assessment practices based on their profiles, such as age or gender. Students had positive views of the assessments, but these did not strongly affect their performance in science. The weak negative link suggests that other factors, like learning styles or outside influences, may play a bigger role in their success. Based on the findings, the study recommends improving assessment practices by including activities that build critical thinking skills. Extra support, such as tutoring or remedial lessons, or interventions can help struggling students improve. Giving clear feedback and adjusting teaching methods to meet theneeds of the students can make learning more effective. Regularly reviewing assessments is also important to keep improving the learning process.

Pantao, international journal of the humanities and social sciencesVol. 4(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.