Culture as Collateral Damage? Evidence From the Impact of Sanctions on Cultural Trade

ABSTRACT We examine how various types of sanctions—trade, financial, military, arms and travel—affect trade in cultural goods, and, for comparison, in non‐cultural goods. We find that trade sanctions have significant negative impacts on cultural and non‐cultural trade. The magnitude and nature of these impacts vary depending on the type and coverage of trade sanctions. Furthermore, our study reveals significant collateral damage to bilateral cultural trade caused by arms, military assistance, financial and travel sanctions. Conversely, non‐cultural trade is primarily influenced by financial and travel sanctions. Examining the origins of sanctions provides deeper insights into their diverse impacts. Specifically, our analysis highlights that the United States (U.S.)‐imposed sanctions across various types have significant unintended consequences for bilateral U.S. cultural trade with sanctioned countries. Similarly, both U.S. and European Union (EU) sanctions, regardless of their type, exert a substantial impact on their non‐cultural trade with sanctioned countries. Although sanctions may be justified from a political standpoint, our findings underscore the importance for policymakers to prioritise the promotion of cultural trade and its potential role in peacebuilding efforts once sanctions are lifted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Economy
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.70012
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Culture as Collateral Damage? Evidence From the Impact of Sanctions on Cultural Trade

Sara Maioli, Giorgio Fazio, Muharrem Cevik
World Economy
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
article

Culture as Collateral Damage? Evidence From the Impact of Sanctions on Cultural Trade

Sara Maioli, Giorgio Fazio, Muharrem Cevik
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We examine how various types of sanctions—trade, financial, military, arms and travel—affect trade in cultural goods, and, for comparison, in non‐cultural goods. We find that trade sanctions have significant negative impacts on cultural and non‐cultural trade. The magnitude and nature of these impacts vary depending on the type and coverage of trade sanctions. Furthermore, our study reveals significant collateral damage to bilateral cultural trade caused by arms, military assistance, financial and travel sanctions. Conversely, non‐cultural trade is primarily influenced by financial and travel sanctions. Examining the origins of sanctions provides deeper insights into their diverse impacts. Specifically, our analysis highlights that the United States (U.S.)‐imposed sanctions across various types have significant unintended consequences for bilateral U.S. cultural trade with sanctioned countries. Similarly, both U.S. and European Union (EU) sanctions, regardless of their type, exert a substantial impact on their non‐cultural trade with sanctioned countries. Although sanctions may be justified from a political standpoint, our findings underscore the importance for policymakers to prioritise the promotion of cultural trade and its potential role in peacebuilding efforts once sanctions are lifted.

World EconomyVol. 48(11)
Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi (TR), CREATe Centre (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Newcastle University, Arts and Humanities Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.