Integrating Australian Employment Law Practice in Support of People with Disabilities in Indonesia

Individuals with disabilities encounter markedly diminished work prospects relative to their non-disabled counterparts, attributable to societal hurdles, cultural bias, and inadequate legal safeguards. This study seeks to assess and incorporate inclusive employment practices from Australia into the legal and institutional framework of Indonesia. The research employs a normative legal method, incorporating doctrinal analysis and comparative study, to examine Australia's *Disability Employment Services (DES)* framework and the *Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (DDA)*, revised as of July 2023. The contrast underscores possible adaptations within Indonesia’s employment legislation framework, which remains deficient in explicit procedures for reasonable accommodation, efficient enforcement of disability employment quotas, and organized career coaching assistance. Furthermore, the study highlights significant disparities in institutional capability and legal culture between the two nations—Australia maintains a rights-based anti-discrimination legal framework, but Indonesia persists with sectoral and charity-focused methodologies. The results demonstrate that the partial integration of DES and DDA concepts is achievable, contingent upon contextual modifications to accommodate Indonesia's socio-political conditions, institutional constraints, and prevailing legal structures. Essential recommendations encompass the formulation of adaptable work accommodation regulations, the introduction of wage subsidies or tax incentives, the creation of training programs specific to disability categories, and the enhancement of employment oversight agencies equipped to combat workplace discrimination. These findings confirm that implementing Australia’s inclusive employment policies could strategically advance the establishment of a fairer and empowered workplace for individuals with disabilities in Indonesia, aligning with global standards and Indonesia’s constitutional commitment to equality.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Khazanah Hukum
Published
2025-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v7i2.44946
Primary Topic
Discrimination and Equality Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Australian Employment Law Practice in Support of People with Disabilities in Indonesia

Arpangi, Andri Winjaya Laksana, Denny Suwondo, Yassine Chami
Khazanah Hukum
Discrimination and Equality Law
article

Integrating Australian Employment Law Practice in Support of People with Disabilities in Indonesia

Arpangi, Andri Winjaya Laksana, Denny Suwondo, Yassine Chami
article en

Abstract

Individuals with disabilities encounter markedly diminished work prospects relative to their non-disabled counterparts, attributable to societal hurdles, cultural bias, and inadequate legal safeguards. This study seeks to assess and incorporate inclusive employment practices from Australia into the legal and institutional framework of Indonesia. The research employs a normative legal method, incorporating doctrinal analysis and comparative study, to examine Australia's *Disability Employment Services (DES)* framework and the *Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (DDA)*, revised as of July 2023. The contrast underscores possible adaptations within Indonesia’s employment legislation framework, which remains deficient in explicit procedures for reasonable accommodation, efficient enforcement of disability employment quotas, and organized career coaching assistance. Furthermore, the study highlights significant disparities in institutional capability and legal culture between the two nations—Australia maintains a rights-based anti-discrimination legal framework, but Indonesia persists with sectoral and charity-focused methodologies. The results demonstrate that the partial integration of DES and DDA concepts is achievable, contingent upon contextual modifications to accommodate Indonesia's socio-political conditions, institutional constraints, and prevailing legal structures. Essential recommendations encompass the formulation of adaptable work accommodation regulations, the introduction of wage subsidies or tax incentives, the creation of training programs specific to disability categories, and the enhancement of employment oversight agencies equipped to combat workplace discrimination. These findings confirm that implementing Australia’s inclusive employment policies could strategically advance the establishment of a fairer and empowered workplace for individuals with disabilities in Indonesia, aligning with global standards and Indonesia’s constitutional commitment to equality.

Khazanah HukumVol. 7(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Discrimination and Equality Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Integrating Australian Employment Law Practice in Support of People with Disabilities in Indonesia — Arpangi, Andri Winjaya Laksana, et al. · Khazanah Hukum (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS