Speech, Text, and Reality: <em>Kokugaku</em> and the Buddhist Roots of Japanese Philology

This article aims to overcome the longstanding dichotomy between religion and philology in scholarly discourse on <em>kokugaku</em>. Specifically, it argues that philology as it was practiced by the paradigmatic figure of the <em>kokugaku</em> movement, Motoori Norinaga, not only borrowed certain philological methods of analysis from the Shingon Buddhist cleric Keichū but also took for granted the esoteric Buddhist understanding of language that formed the context for the practice of those methods. Keichū, in turn, borrowed these from his fellow Shingon cleric Jōgon, a groundbreaking scholar of Sanskrit and leading figure in the early modern Japanese precepts reform movement. Already in his studies of Sanskrit, Jōgon formulated the basic principles and methods of Japanese philology as it came to be practiced first by Keichū and subsequently by scholars of <em>kokugaku</em>: a concern for recovering the sound of written graphs and a belief that the recovery of those sounds would restore a salvific use of language that had been lost to humanity. The motivation shared by Jōgon and Keichū to retrieve and revive a lost salvific language practice took shape in the context of their involvement in the early modern Buddhist precepts reform movement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Japanese Journal of Religious Studies
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18874/jjrs.51.2.2024.171-195
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Speech, Text, and Reality: Kokugaku and the Buddhist Roots of Japanese Philology

Emi Foulk Bushelle
Japanese Journal of Religious Studies
Chinese history and philosophy
article

Speech, Text, and Reality: Kokugaku and the Buddhist Roots of Japanese Philology

Emi Foulk Bushelle
article en

Abstract

This article aims to overcome the longstanding dichotomy between religion and philology in scholarly discourse on <em>kokugaku</em>. Specifically, it argues that philology as it was practiced by the paradigmatic figure of the <em>kokugaku</em> movement, Motoori Norinaga, not only borrowed certain philological methods of analysis from the Shingon Buddhist cleric Keichū but also took for granted the esoteric Buddhist understanding of language that formed the context for the practice of those methods. Keichū, in turn, borrowed these from his fellow Shingon cleric Jōgon, a groundbreaking scholar of Sanskrit and leading figure in the early modern Japanese precepts reform movement. Already in his studies of Sanskrit, Jōgon formulated the basic principles and methods of Japanese philology as it came to be practiced first by Keichū and subsequently by scholars of <em>kokugaku</em>: a concern for recovering the sound of written graphs and a belief that the recovery of those sounds would restore a salvific use of language that had been lost to humanity. The motivation shared by Jōgon and Keichū to retrieve and revive a lost salvific language practice took shape in the context of their involvement in the early modern Buddhist precepts reform movement.

Japanese Journal of Religious StudiesVol. 51(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Speech, Text, and Reality: <em>Kokugaku</em> and the Buddhist Roots of Japanese Philology — Emi Foulk Bushelle · Japanese Journal of Religious Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS