Why Teach Religion?: Scholars of Religion and Education Policy in Postwar Japan

This article examines how scholars of religion attempted to influence education policy after World War ii. Building on the clout they had gained during the Allied Occupation of Japan, some religious studies scholars capitalized on a series of moral panics to argue that their style of teaching religion could contribute to society, experimenting with terminology such as “religious knowledge education,” “religious sensitivity education,” or “religious culture education” as they did so. These attempts to affect how schools taught about religion reflected the orientations of the International Institute for the Study of Religion, established in 1953 by former occupier William P. Woodard and University of Tokyo Professor of Religion Kishimoto Hideo. Because the <em>Japanese Journal of Religious Studies</em> also emerged from this Kishimoto-Woodard collaboration, I invite readers to reflect anew on how scholars of religion can best contribute to policy, both in terms of education and more broadly. I conclude that our strength is not that we have “the answers” about religion, but that we specialize in questions: Who calls what “religion,” why, and with which effects?

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Japanese Journal of Religious Studies
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18874/jjrs.51.2.2024.221-251
Primary Topic
Religious Education and Schools
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Teach Religion?: Scholars of Religion and Education Policy in Postwar Japan

Jolyon Baraka Thomas
Japanese Journal of Religious Studies
Religious Education and Schools
article

Why Teach Religion?: Scholars of Religion and Education Policy in Postwar Japan

Jolyon Baraka Thomas
article en

Abstract

This article examines how scholars of religion attempted to influence education policy after World War ii. Building on the clout they had gained during the Allied Occupation of Japan, some religious studies scholars capitalized on a series of moral panics to argue that their style of teaching religion could contribute to society, experimenting with terminology such as “religious knowledge education,” “religious sensitivity education,” or “religious culture education” as they did so. These attempts to affect how schools taught about religion reflected the orientations of the International Institute for the Study of Religion, established in 1953 by former occupier William P. Woodard and University of Tokyo Professor of Religion Kishimoto Hideo. Because the <em>Japanese Journal of Religious Studies</em> also emerged from this Kishimoto-Woodard collaboration, I invite readers to reflect anew on how scholars of religion can best contribute to policy, both in terms of education and more broadly. I conclude that our strength is not that we have “the answers” about religion, but that we specialize in questions: Who calls what “religion,” why, and with which effects?

Japanese Journal of Religious StudiesVol. 51(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Religious Education and Schools
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.