Fibula-first fixation in same-level distal third tibia and fibula fractures: A pilot randomized controlled trial

IntroductionFractures of the tibia and fibula occurring at the same level can be technically challenging. Fibular plating (FP) prior to intramedullary nailing (IMN) may facilitate tibial reduction, stabilization, and subsequent tibial healing. The primary goal of this study was to compare tibial fracture healing between FP and no fibular plating (NFP) in patients with same-level distal third tibia/fibula fractures.MethodsPatients ≥18 years with distal third tibia/fibula fractures occurring at the same level were randomized to FP or NFP prior to infrapatellar IMN. Same-level fractures were defined as distal third tibia fractures with an ipsilateral supra-syndesmotic distal third fibula fracture. Intraoperative parameters, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), modified Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fractures (mRUST) scores, radiographic alignment, and adverse events were recorded.Results30 patients were recruited, with 15 randomized to each group. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between groups. Total operative time was longer in FP compared with NFP (105.5 vs 65.8 minutes, <i>p</i> = .001). Mean duration of fibular fixation was 28.1 minutes (SD = 11.9). There was no difference in duration of IMN; however, less time was required to pass the guidewire in FP (4.5 vs 11.8 minutes, <i>p</i> = .01). Patients in FP had higher mRUST scores at 6 months, lower incidence of delayed union, and shorter fibular time-to-union. There were no differences in alignment between groups.ConclusionFibula-first fixation facilitated passage of the tibial guidewire and resulted in a modest improvement in the rate of tibia fracture healing. The results of this pilot study suggest that fibula-first fixation may be beneficial in patients with same-level distal third tibia/fibula fractures. Further research with larger sample sizes is needed to determine which patients may benefit most from fibula-first fixation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536251364177
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fibula-first fixation in same-level distal third tibia and fibula fractures: A pilot randomized controlled trial

Richard Buckley, Ryan Martin, Prism Schneider, Gareth Ryan et al.
1 citations
Journal of orthopaedic surgery
Bone fractures and treatments
1.35
article

Fibula-first fixation in same-level distal third tibia and fibula fractures: A pilot randomized controlled trial

Richard Buckley, Ryan Martin, Prism Schneider, Gareth Ryan, Paul Duffy, K. Rondeau, Robert Korley
article en
1 citations

Abstract

IntroductionFractures of the tibia and fibula occurring at the same level can be technically challenging. Fibular plating (FP) prior to intramedullary nailing (IMN) may facilitate tibial reduction, stabilization, and subsequent tibial healing. The primary goal of this study was to compare tibial fracture healing between FP and no fibular plating (NFP) in patients with same-level distal third tibia/fibula fractures.MethodsPatients ≥18 years with distal third tibia/fibula fractures occurring at the same level were randomized to FP or NFP prior to infrapatellar IMN. Same-level fractures were defined as distal third tibia fractures with an ipsilateral supra-syndesmotic distal third fibula fracture. Intraoperative parameters, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), modified Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fractures (mRUST) scores, radiographic alignment, and adverse events were recorded.Results30 patients were recruited, with 15 randomized to each group. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between groups. Total operative time was longer in FP compared with NFP (105.5 vs 65.8 minutes, <i>p</i> = .001). Mean duration of fibular fixation was 28.1 minutes (SD = 11.9). There was no difference in duration of IMN; however, less time was required to pass the guidewire in FP (4.5 vs 11.8 minutes, <i>p</i> = .01). Patients in FP had higher mRUST scores at 6 months, lower incidence of delayed union, and shorter fibular time-to-union. There were no differences in alignment between groups.ConclusionFibula-first fixation facilitated passage of the tibial guidewire and resulted in a modest improvement in the rate of tibia fracture healing. The results of this pilot study suggest that fibula-first fixation may be beneficial in patients with same-level distal third tibia/fibula fractures. Further research with larger sample sizes is needed to determine which patients may benefit most from fibula-first fixation.

Journal of orthopaedic surgeryVol. 33(2)
University of Calgary (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Bone fractures and treatments
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.