Neo-Imperialism or Retreat? Historicizing Trump’s Role in the Middle East Crisis Through 2025

This study examines the evolving nature of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East under Donald Trump through the lens of neo-imperialism and strategic retreat, contextualized through events up to 2025. By employing a mixed-methods approach that combines AI-assisted primary data collection with secondary data analysis, the research interrogates the geopolitical shifts triggered by Trump’s transactional diplomacy, military repositioning, and economic coercion strategies. The findings reveal a complex hybrid of imperialist tendencies—manifested through economic dominance and unilateral policy assertions—alongside selective disengagement and regional burden-shifting. This duality challenges traditional frameworks of U.S. hegemony and suggests a recalibrated, post-unipolar form of global influence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universal Library of languages and literatures.
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70315/uloap.ullli.2025.0201001
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neo-Imperialism or Retreat? Historicizing Trump’s Role in the Middle East Crisis Through 2025

Lee Bih Ni
Universal Library of languages and literatures.
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

Neo-Imperialism or Retreat? Historicizing Trump’s Role in the Middle East Crisis Through 2025

Lee Bih Ni
article en

Abstract

This study examines the evolving nature of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East under Donald Trump through the lens of neo-imperialism and strategic retreat, contextualized through events up to 2025. By employing a mixed-methods approach that combines AI-assisted primary data collection with secondary data analysis, the research interrogates the geopolitical shifts triggered by Trump’s transactional diplomacy, military repositioning, and economic coercion strategies. The findings reveal a complex hybrid of imperialist tendencies—manifested through economic dominance and unilateral policy assertions—alongside selective disengagement and regional burden-shifting. This duality challenges traditional frameworks of U.S. hegemony and suggests a recalibrated, post-unipolar form of global influence.

Universal Library of languages and literatures.Vol. 02(01)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.