Using scaffolds to support preservice teachers’ reflective practice

Introduction The primary purpose of this study was to examine the impact of various types of reflection prompt scaffolds on preservice teachers’ metacognitive and problem-solving abilities. Methods Participants were preservice teachers in an educational technology course within an accredited teacher education program. Mixed-methods data were collected using a cycle of reflection beginning with concrete and authentic situations encountered during a simulated teaching activity and resulting in reflective observation through blogs. Two rounds of teaching and reflection occurred, with blog reflections scaffolded by two types of prompts: traditional descriptive and critical incident. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed separately and findings were integrated across phases and data type. Results Results indicated that the type of scaffold impacted ill-structured problem-solving, pedagogical reasoning processes, metacognition, and reflective thinking in various ways. Discussion Implications for teacher education are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1621269
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Reflective Practices in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
35.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using scaffolds to support preservice teachers’ reflective practice

Tina Chaseley, Sara Abercrombie
4 citations
Frontiers in Education
Reflective Practices in Education
35.70
article

Using scaffolds to support preservice teachers’ reflective practice

Tina Chaseley, Sara Abercrombie
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Introduction The primary purpose of this study was to examine the impact of various types of reflection prompt scaffolds on preservice teachers’ metacognitive and problem-solving abilities. Methods Participants were preservice teachers in an educational technology course within an accredited teacher education program. Mixed-methods data were collected using a cycle of reflection beginning with concrete and authentic situations encountered during a simulated teaching activity and resulting in reflective observation through blogs. Two rounds of teaching and reflection occurred, with blog reflections scaffolded by two types of prompts: traditional descriptive and critical incident. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed separately and findings were integrated across phases and data type. Results Results indicated that the type of scaffold impacted ill-structured problem-solving, pedagogical reasoning processes, metacognition, and reflective thinking in various ways. Discussion Implications for teacher education are discussed.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
Northern Arizona University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Reflective Practices in Education
35.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Using scaffolds to support preservice teachers’ reflective practice — Tina Chaseley, Sara Abercrombie · Frontiers in Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS