Change of direction profile in parabadminton: the role of impairment type and anthropometric factors

Introduction: Parabadminton (PBd), introduced at the 2020 Paralympics, accommodates athletes with diverse physical impairments.Differences in physical and physiological performance between these groups emphasize the need for tailored assessments to refine classification information and training strategies.This study aims to evaluate change of direction (COD) performance across sport classes and examine the influence of anthropometric factors on performance in PBd athletes.Material and methods: Seventy-nine PBd athletes, classified as wheelchair (WH1, WH2) or standing (SL3, SL4, SU5, SH6), participated.All had official classifications and prior competition experience.Data collection included demographics, skinfold measurements, and arm muscle area (AMA) assessments.A COD test simulated gameplay to measure times, fatigue index, and mechanical power.Statistical analyses employed Kruskal-Wallis tests and MANCOVA to compare sport classes, controlling for covariates like age, body mass index (BMI), and practice time.Results: Significant differences in COD performance were observed between sport classes, except for the fatigue index.Large effect sizes (f 0.702) were found for "worst time," "mean time," and "best time," with post-hoc tests identifying multiple differences between wheelchair and standing classes.Smaller differences (f = 0.058) were noted for "total power," primarily between standing and wheelchair groups.MANCOVA analysis revealed BMI, height, practice time, and AMA as significant predictors of COD performance, depending on sport classes and type of impairment.Conclusions: Anthropometric factors, particularly height, age, body mass, and practice time, influence COD performance in PBd athletes.These findings highlight the relevance of sport class differences and underscore the need for training programs that address functional and physical distinctions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Rehabilitation
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5114/areh.2025.153216
Primary Topic
Healthcare and Venom Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Change of direction profile in parabadminton: the role of impairment type and anthropometric factors

Herman Felder, Túlio Diniz Fernandes, José Oliveira, Saulo Fernandes Melo de Oliveira et al.
Advances in Rehabilitation
Healthcare and Venom Research
article

Change of direction profile in parabadminton: the role of impairment type and anthropometric factors

Herman Felder, Túlio Diniz Fernandes, José Oliveira, Saulo Fernandes Melo de Oliveira, Marcelo de Castro Haiachi, Juliana Ferreira Alves
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Parabadminton (PBd), introduced at the 2020 Paralympics, accommodates athletes with diverse physical impairments.Differences in physical and physiological performance between these groups emphasize the need for tailored assessments to refine classification information and training strategies.This study aims to evaluate change of direction (COD) performance across sport classes and examine the influence of anthropometric factors on performance in PBd athletes.Material and methods: Seventy-nine PBd athletes, classified as wheelchair (WH1, WH2) or standing (SL3, SL4, SU5, SH6), participated.All had official classifications and prior competition experience.Data collection included demographics, skinfold measurements, and arm muscle area (AMA) assessments.A COD test simulated gameplay to measure times, fatigue index, and mechanical power.Statistical analyses employed Kruskal-Wallis tests and MANCOVA to compare sport classes, controlling for covariates like age, body mass index (BMI), and practice time.Results: Significant differences in COD performance were observed between sport classes, except for the fatigue index.Large effect sizes (f 0.702) were found for "worst time," "mean time," and "best time," with post-hoc tests identifying multiple differences between wheelchair and standing classes.Smaller differences (f = 0.058) were noted for "total power," primarily between standing and wheelchair groups.MANCOVA analysis revealed BMI, height, practice time, and AMA as significant predictors of COD performance, depending on sport classes and type of impairment.Conclusions: Anthropometric factors, particularly height, age, body mass, and practice time, influence COD performance in PBd athletes.These findings highlight the relevance of sport class differences and underscore the need for training programs that address functional and physical distinctions.

Advances in RehabilitationVol. 39(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Healthcare and Venom Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.