«A Portrait of a Contemporary Person»: Documentary Films of the 1960s–1980s, Dedicated to Ukrainian Writers

The purpose of the study is to examine the peculiarities of representing the images of Ukrainian writers of Soviet period in documentary portraits dedicated to their contemporaries; to find out the role of these cinematic images in the process of constructing Soviet identity and forming a «new person», a «builder of communism». Research methodology. The research is based on theoretical developments and concepts of foreign and Ukrainian scholars in the fields of source studies, film studies, cultural history, identity construction studies, and studies of the Soviet past. The work was conducted using general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis based on the principles of historicism and objectivity. In covering the topic, the author also applied the methods of source criticism, chronological, systematic, typological analysis, and case method. Scientific novelty. The representation of the images of Ukrainian contemporary writers in Soviet documentaries as one of the tools for forming the identity of Ukrainians of the Ukrainian SSR has not yet been the subject of scientific research. Conclusions. Film documents are important testimonies to the time of their creation and provide significant material for understanding it, as well as a valuable source for studying images and ideas that emerge in the public consciousness. Ukrainian documentary filmmaking of the 1960s and 1980s, like the cinema of that time in general, was under severe ideological and censorship pressure. The Soviet totalitarian system viewed cinema primarily as a powerful means of propaganda and a tool for educating the «Soviet person». The cinematic images of contemporary Ukrainian writers of Soviet period represented in portrait films, despite the authorities' attempts to use them to construct a universal Soviet identity, were predominantly binary in nature, contributing to the penetration and establishment of Soviet values, and, having a national connotation, resisting the complete dissolution of national identity. References: 1. Bezruchko, O. & Stepanenko, N. (2024). Kino yak osnova formuvannia/tvorennia modernoi natsionalnoi identychnosti [Cinema as a basis for the formation/creation of modern national identity]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu kultury i mystetstv. Seriia : Audiovizualne mystetstvo i vyrobnytstvo, 7(1), 20–30 [іn Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.31866/2617-2674.7.1.2024.3027562. Desiatnyk, H. O. (2016). Osnovy ekrannoi dokumentalistyky [Basics of screen documentary filmmaking]. Kyiv : KNU. 287 s. [іn Ukrainian].3. Kahanov, Yu. O. (2019). Konstruiuvannia «radianskoi liudyny» (1953–1991) : ukrainska versiia [The construction of the «Soviet man» (1953–1991) : Ukrainian version.]. Zaporizhzhia : Inter-M. 432 s. [іn Ukrainian].4. Konivitska, T. (2024). Kino yak zasib formuvannia identychnosti studenta u zakladakh vyshchoi osvity [Cinema as a Means of Forming Student Identity in Higher Education Institutions]. In Transformatsiia identychnosti v umovakh suchasnoho ukrainskoho suspilstva [Identity Transformation in the Context of Modern Ukrainian Society, Proceedings of the Conference Title] (pp. 114–117). Lviv [іn Ukrainian].5. Kuzmenko, O. (2012). Kino yak instrument formuvannia natsionalnoi identychnosti. Ukrainskyi kontekst [Cinema as an instrument of national identity formation. The Ukrainian context]. In KULTURY WSCHODNIOSŁOWIAŃSKIE – OBLICZA I DIALOG. (Vol. II, pp. 66–75) [іn Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.14746/kw.2012.2.86. Miller, J. (2010). Soviet Cinema : Politics and Persuasion under Stalin. London : I. B. Tauris. 224 p. [in English]. https://doi.org/10.5040/97807556975577. Plokhii, S. (2024). Materialy dyskusii «Do 30-littia rozvalu SRSR. Radianske mynule y radianska spadshchyna : pidkhody do vyvchennia ta mozhlyvosti podolannia» [Materials of the discussion «To the 30th anniversary of the collapse of the USSR. The Soviet Past and Soviet Heritage : Approaches to Studying and Possibilities of Overcoming»]. In Radianske «ia» i radianske «my» mizh ideolohiieiu i realnistiu [Soviet «I» and Soviet «We» between Ideologyand Reality]. Kyiv : DUKh I LITERA [іn Ukrainian].8. Ries, L. (2012). Visual Hammer : How Images Trump Words. New York : Ries & Ries. 164 p. [in English].9. Shchyhol, I. V. (2021). Ukrainske pysmenstvo yak sotsialno-profesiina hrupa : istoryko-sotsialna dynamika stanovlennia (kinets XVIII – pochatok XX stolittia) [Ukrainian Writing as a Social and Professional Group : Historical and Social Dynamics of Formation (end of the 18th – beginning of the 20th century)] (Candidate’s thesis). Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Kyiv [іn Ukrainian].10. Tsyba, H. (2014). Poshuky natsionalnoi identychnosti ta istorychnoi pravdy v ukrainskomu kino doby Perebudovy (1986–1991) [The Search for National Identity and Historical Truth in Ukrainian Cinema of the Perestroika Era (1986–1991)]. MIST : Mystetstvo, istoriia, suchasnist, teoriia, 10, 224–233 [іn Ukrainian].11. Zavhorodnia, O. (2011, December, 2) Retrospektsiia. Do 80-richchia Ukrainskoi studii khronikalno-dokumentalnykh filmiv. Interviu iz samoiu soboiu [On the 80th anniversary of the Ukrainian Studio of Chronicle and Documentary Films. An interview with myself]. Dzerkalo tyzhnia. Retrieved from https://zn.ua/ukr/SOCIUM/retrospektsiya__do_80-richchya_ukrayinskoyi_studiyi_hronikalno-dokumentalnih_filmiv_intervyu_iz_samo.html [іn Ukrainian].