Drug Resistance Genes and Source of Methicillin Resistant <i>Staphylococcus </i><i>aureus</i> Strains amongst HIV Patients in Fako Division of Cameroon: A Case-Control Study

Background: Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and severe antimicrobial resistance is worsened in HIV positive patients, driven by the presence of drug resistance traits. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of MRSA, antibiotic susceptibility, source of infection and the distribution of drug resistance genes amongst HIV positive and HIV negative participants in Fako-Cameroon. Methods: Urine and nasal samples were cultured on CLED and MSA agar respectively following standard procedures. The clinical isolates were characterized biochemically and comfirmed by nuc gene detection of S. aureus. Antimicrobial susceptibility with selected locally prescribed antibiotics was done using the Kirby Bauer disc diffusion technique. Drug resistance genes (vanA, mecA, ermA, sul3 and ermC) were determined using PCR amplification. Data was analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2016 and SPSS version 25; Chi square was set at P ≤ 0.05. Results: The overall prevalence of MRSA was 28.8%. MRSA was higher (P = 0.0001) in HIV positive patients (19.4%) than in HIV negative individuals (9.4%). Amongst HIV positive and HIV negative participants, high sensitivity of urogenital S. aureus was observed amongst Aminoglycosides [Amikacin (26.3% vs 52.9%)] and Nitrofurans [Nitrofurantoin (25.2% vs 53.1%)]. Resistance was seen against Ciprofloxacin [39.5% vs 41.2%] in HIV positive and HIV negative participants respectively. MAR index of urogenital S. aureus was higher amongst HIV positive patients (0.9) compared to HIV negative individuals (0.7). Majority (38.0%) of S. aureus clinical isolates cultured from the urine of HIV positive patients were not identical to isolates from the nostrils of the same patients. The overall detection rate of drug resistance genes were distributed as follows; vanA (30.8%), ermA (29.6%), mecA (28.6%), sul3 (21.6%) and ermC (18.0%). Conclusion: Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus is more common amongst HIV positive patients, with the clinical isolates being, more resistant to commonly prescribed antimicrobial agents. The clinical isolates causing urinary tract infections in HIV positive patients are usually not from the normal flora (the nostrils).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of AIDS
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/wja.2025.153004
Primary Topic
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drug Resistance Genes and Source of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains amongst HIV Patients in Fako Division of Cameroon: A Case-Control Study

Benjamin D. Thumamo Pokam, Stephen Mbigha Ghogomu, Raymond Babila Nyasa, Augustine Anumbondem et al.
1 links
World Journal of AIDS
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
article

Drug Resistance Genes and Source of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains amongst HIV Patients in Fako Division of Cameroon: A Case-Control Study

Benjamin D. Thumamo Pokam, Stephen Mbigha Ghogomu, Raymond Babila Nyasa, Augustine Anumbondem, Blessing Ayang Enjong, Noelar Ndille Elua
article en

Abstract

Background: Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and severe antimicrobial resistance is worsened in HIV positive patients, driven by the presence of drug resistance traits. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of MRSA, antibiotic susceptibility, source of infection and the distribution of drug resistance genes amongst HIV positive and HIV negative participants in Fako-Cameroon. Methods: Urine and nasal samples were cultured on CLED and MSA agar respectively following standard procedures. The clinical isolates were characterized biochemically and comfirmed by nuc gene detection of S. aureus. Antimicrobial susceptibility with selected locally prescribed antibiotics was done using the Kirby Bauer disc diffusion technique. Drug resistance genes (vanA, mecA, ermA, sul3 and ermC) were determined using PCR amplification. Data was analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2016 and SPSS version 25; Chi square was set at P ≤ 0.05. Results: The overall prevalence of MRSA was 28.8%. MRSA was higher (P = 0.0001) in HIV positive patients (19.4%) than in HIV negative individuals (9.4%). Amongst HIV positive and HIV negative participants, high sensitivity of urogenital S. aureus was observed amongst Aminoglycosides [Amikacin (26.3% vs 52.9%)] and Nitrofurans [Nitrofurantoin (25.2% vs 53.1%)]. Resistance was seen against Ciprofloxacin [39.5% vs 41.2%] in HIV positive and HIV negative participants respectively. MAR index of urogenital S. aureus was higher amongst HIV positive patients (0.9) compared to HIV negative individuals (0.7). Majority (38.0%) of S. aureus clinical isolates cultured from the urine of HIV positive patients were not identical to isolates from the nostrils of the same patients. The overall detection rate of drug resistance genes were distributed as follows; vanA (30.8%), ermA (29.6%), mecA (28.6%), sul3 (21.6%) and ermC (18.0%). Conclusion: Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus is more common amongst HIV positive patients, with the clinical isolates being, more resistant to commonly prescribed antimicrobial agents. The clinical isolates causing urinary tract infections in HIV positive patients are usually not from the normal flora (the nostrils).

World Journal of AIDSVol. 15(03)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.