The <i>Lararium</i> of Severus Alexander (<i>HA</i> 29.2; 31.4–5): Rereading a Popular Fable of Syncretistic Christ Devotion

Abstract The famous account in the Historia Augusta of Severus Alexander’s lararium , which contained an image of Christ alongside other figures including Apollonius of Tyana, Vergil, Orpheus, and Achilles, has long been accepted with insufficient discernment and dubious judgment. The present article challenges this ongoing scholarly trend, suggesting that the story should be rejected not only as history but even as a plausible fiction. In defense of this position, both literary and archeological evidence is presented and considered. Ultimately, in line with the basic orientation of modern HA scholarship, the whole tradition is suggested to be understood best as a fictive expression of “innovative traditionalism,” i.e. part of the late fourth-century polytheistic author’s fanciful yet culturally conservative reaction to the ascendant Christian culture of the post-Theodosian world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Harvard Theological Review
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0017816025100709
Primary Topic
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Lararium of Severus Alexander (HA 29.2; 31.4–5): Rereading a Popular Fable of Syncretistic Christ Devotion

Anthony Giambrone
Harvard Theological Review
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
article

The Lararium of Severus Alexander (HA 29.2; 31.4–5): Rereading a Popular Fable of Syncretistic Christ Devotion

Anthony Giambrone
article en

Abstract

Abstract The famous account in the Historia Augusta of Severus Alexander’s lararium , which contained an image of Christ alongside other figures including Apollonius of Tyana, Vergil, Orpheus, and Achilles, has long been accepted with insufficient discernment and dubious judgment. The present article challenges this ongoing scholarly trend, suggesting that the story should be rejected not only as history but even as a plausible fiction. In defense of this position, both literary and archeological evidence is presented and considered. Ultimately, in line with the basic orientation of modern HA scholarship, the whole tradition is suggested to be understood best as a fictive expression of “innovative traditionalism,” i.e. part of the late fourth-century polytheistic author’s fanciful yet culturally conservative reaction to the ascendant Christian culture of the post-Theodosian world.

Harvard Theological ReviewVol. 118(2)
École Biblique et Archéologique Française de Jérusalem (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The <i>Lararium</i> of Severus Alexander (<i>HA</i> 29.2; 31.4–5): Rereading a Popular Fable of Syncretistic Christ Devotion — Anthony Giambrone · Harvard Theological Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS