Refining the Global INSPIRE Measure of Recovery Priorities: A Qualitative, Linguistic, and Statistical Approach

Abstract Background Global INSPIRE is a 20-item self-report scale assessing priorities of personal recovery, defined as living a meaningful and satisfying life despite mental health challenges. Grounded in the CHIME framework (Connectedness, Hope, Identity, Meaning, and Empowerment), it asks how important each item is to the respondent’s recovery. Its initial validation (Version 1.0), involved a UK multicultural sample, showed promise, but model fit needed refinement (CFI = 0.80, TLI = 0.77). Methods Following best practices in scale development (DeVellis, 2016), we employed a three-step approach to enhance the scale’s psychometric properties. First, multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis was conducted in the original sample to identify problematic items. Second, these items were revised using qualitative feedback from six British English-speaking reviewers and corpus linguistic analysis. Third, the revised version was tested in a new UK sample. Results Two problematic items (Items 5 and 13) were identified. Corpus linguistic analysis of six reviewers’ comments suggested Item 5 “Feeling hopeful about my future” be changed to “Believing in a positive future for myself”, and Item 13 “Understanding my mental health experience” to “Finding meaning in my mental health experiences”. The updated version of Global INSPIRE (Version 2.0) was completed by 207 people (Age 40 ± 12.50 years; 115 women, 90 men), yielding substantially improved model fit (CFI = 0.965, TLI = 0.959) and strong internal consistency (ordinal alpha = 0.93; Cronbach’s alpha = 0.91). Conclusion Global INSPIRE British English Version 2.0 offers a more robust tool for assessing recovery priorities, demonstrating the value of integrating quantitative, qualitative, and linguistic approaches in scale refinement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Community Mental Health Journal
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-026-01748-w
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Refining the Global INSPIRE Measure of Recovery Priorities: A Qualitative, Linguistic, and Statistical Approach

Akihiko Ozaki, Mike Slade, Svenja Adolphs, Yasuhiro Kotera et al.
4 links
Community Mental Health Journal
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Refining the Global INSPIRE Measure of Recovery Priorities: A Qualitative, Linguistic, and Statistical Approach

Akihiko Ozaki, Mike Slade, Svenja Adolphs, Yasuhiro Kotera, Sara Vilar-Lluch
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Global INSPIRE is a 20-item self-report scale assessing priorities of personal recovery, defined as living a meaningful and satisfying life despite mental health challenges. Grounded in the CHIME framework (Connectedness, Hope, Identity, Meaning, and Empowerment), it asks how important each item is to the respondent’s recovery. Its initial validation (Version 1.0), involved a UK multicultural sample, showed promise, but model fit needed refinement (CFI = 0.80, TLI = 0.77). Methods Following best practices in scale development (DeVellis, 2016), we employed a three-step approach to enhance the scale’s psychometric properties. First, multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis was conducted in the original sample to identify problematic items. Second, these items were revised using qualitative feedback from six British English-speaking reviewers and corpus linguistic analysis. Third, the revised version was tested in a new UK sample. Results Two problematic items (Items 5 and 13) were identified. Corpus linguistic analysis of six reviewers’ comments suggested Item 5 “Feeling hopeful about my future” be changed to “Believing in a positive future for myself”, and Item 13 “Understanding my mental health experience” to “Finding meaning in my mental health experiences”. The updated version of Global INSPIRE (Version 2.0) was completed by 207 people (Age 40 ± 12.50 years; 115 women, 90 men), yielding substantially improved model fit (CFI = 0.965, TLI = 0.959) and strong internal consistency (ordinal alpha = 0.93; Cronbach’s alpha = 0.91). Conclusion Global INSPIRE British English Version 2.0 offers a more robust tool for assessing recovery priorities, demonstrating the value of integrating quantitative, qualitative, and linguistic approaches in scale refinement.

Community Mental Health Journal
University of Nottingham (GB), Medical Governance Research Institute (JP), Cardiff University (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Great Britain Sasakawa Foundation, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre
Good health and well-being
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon