Energy and exergy analysis of air conditioning system with air-cooled and evaporative cooled condenser: a comparative approach

This study compares the energy and exergy performance of air-conditioning systems with air-cooled condensers and evaporative-cooled condensers using cellulose, banana fibre, jute, and cotton-thread as cooling pads under varying ambient temperatures. The air-conditioning systems with evaporative-cooled condensers using a cellulose pad showed the highest COP increase up to 27.27% and lowest total exergy destruction up to 1.139 kW, achieving an exergetic efficiency range of 24.456% to 19.87%, highlighting its superior thermodynamic performance. In both systems, the condenser was the least efficient component, with the highest efficiency defect at 42.8% in the air-cooled condenser, reduced to 35% using evaporative-cooled condenser with cellulose pad.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Exergy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijex.2025.147745
Primary Topic
Adsorption and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy and exergy analysis of air conditioning system with air-cooled and evaporative cooled condenser: a comparative approach

R. S. N. Sahai, Umais M. Momin
International Journal of Exergy
Adsorption and Cooling Systems
article

Energy and exergy analysis of air conditioning system with air-cooled and evaporative cooled condenser: a comparative approach

R. S. N. Sahai, Umais M. Momin
article en

Abstract

This study compares the energy and exergy performance of air-conditioning systems with air-cooled condensers and evaporative-cooled condensers using cellulose, banana fibre, jute, and cotton-thread as cooling pads under varying ambient temperatures. The air-conditioning systems with evaporative-cooled condensers using a cellulose pad showed the highest COP increase up to 27.27% and lowest total exergy destruction up to 1.139 kW, achieving an exergetic efficiency range of 24.456% to 19.87%, highlighting its superior thermodynamic performance. In both systems, the condenser was the least efficient component, with the highest efficiency defect at 42.8% in the air-cooled condenser, reduced to 35% using evaporative-cooled condenser with cellulose pad.

International Journal of ExergyVol. 47(4)
Institute of Chemical Technology (IN), University of Mumbai (IN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Adsorption and Cooling Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Energy and exergy analysis of air conditioning system with air-cooled and evaporative cooled condenser: a comparative approach — R. S. N. Sahai, Umais M. Momin · International Journal of Exergy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS