Comparison of hematological markers between rheumatoid factor positive and rheumatoid factor negative patients

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease primarily affecting the joints producing a chronic non-suppurative inflammatory synovitis that transforms into an inflammatory multi-systemic disorder. The diagnosis of RA relies on radiological findings along with positive Rheumatoid Factor (RF). Aims and objectives: This study focuses on the role of haematological markers (HM) in patients with RA. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study. Twenty-One RF positive and Twenty-five RF negative patients with other inflammatory conditions were included in the study. The hemogram reports were retrieved from hospital records for calculation of the HM, Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), Neutrophil-to-Haemoglobin and lymphocyte score (NHL), Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio (NHL), and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Test of statistical significance was done using Student’s T test and Mann Whitney U test. p-value ≤0.05 was statistically significant. Results: The mean and standard deviation of SII, NHL, NLR and PLR for RF positive patients are 1852.22±1557.67, 66.67±67.17,5.17±5.37,242.79±121.44 respectively. The mean and standard deviation of SII, NHL, NLR and PLR for RF negative patients are 1631.92±2497.29, 63.73±71.05, 5.29±5.72, 184.80±116 respectively. The p-value of SII, NHL, NLR and PLR is 0.7099, 0.8811, 0.9394, 0.0907 respectively. Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences in the levels of SII, NHL, and NLR between RF-positive and RF-negative patients (p>0.05 for all). PLR demonstrated a borderline trend toward significance (p=0.0907), suggesting that it may differ between the groups and could warrant further investigation in larger cohorts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Pathology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33545/pathol.2025.v8.i3a.2088
Primary Topic
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of hematological markers between rheumatoid factor positive and rheumatoid factor negative patients

Jyothi Anantharaj, Aradhana Harrison, Vejay viknesh
International Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Pathology
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
article

Comparison of hematological markers between rheumatoid factor positive and rheumatoid factor negative patients

Jyothi Anantharaj, Aradhana Harrison, Vejay viknesh
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease primarily affecting the joints producing a chronic non-suppurative inflammatory synovitis that transforms into an inflammatory multi-systemic disorder. The diagnosis of RA relies on radiological findings along with positive Rheumatoid Factor (RF). Aims and objectives: This study focuses on the role of haematological markers (HM) in patients with RA. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study. Twenty-One RF positive and Twenty-five RF negative patients with other inflammatory conditions were included in the study. The hemogram reports were retrieved from hospital records for calculation of the HM, Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), Neutrophil-to-Haemoglobin and lymphocyte score (NHL), Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio (NHL), and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Test of statistical significance was done using Student’s T test and Mann Whitney U test. p-value ≤0.05 was statistically significant. Results: The mean and standard deviation of SII, NHL, NLR and PLR for RF positive patients are 1852.22±1557.67, 66.67±67.17,5.17±5.37,242.79±121.44 respectively. The mean and standard deviation of SII, NHL, NLR and PLR for RF negative patients are 1631.92±2497.29, 63.73±71.05, 5.29±5.72, 184.80±116 respectively. The p-value of SII, NHL, NLR and PLR is 0.7099, 0.8811, 0.9394, 0.0907 respectively. Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences in the levels of SII, NHL, and NLR between RF-positive and RF-negative patients (p>0.05 for all). PLR demonstrated a borderline trend toward significance (p=0.0907), suggesting that it may differ between the groups and could warrant further investigation in larger cohorts.

International Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic PathologyVol. 8(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.