Ecocide: from a war crime to an international crime?

in response to the relevance achieved in the last decade, this article explores the evolution of ecocide as a legal concept, from its origins to its contemporary status as a potential international crime, with the aim of assessing whether current proposals are viable and legally coherent. Using both historical and black-letter legal approaches, the research traces the reciprocal influence of early ecocide definitions on international humanitarian law, and how the latter in turn contributed to consolidating a particular legal conception of the former. Focusing on the key elements of the currently prohibited threshold of environmental damage during armed conflicts, the study addresses its limitations, highlighting the ambiguities of the terms and their unsuitability for peacetime application. We conclude that while ecocide was ultimately codified as a war crime in article 8.2(b)(iv) of the Rome Statute, its broader recognition as a standalone international crime requires clearer definitions and a reconsideration of the threshold criteria, in this way contributing to advancing the legal understanding of ecocide and its potential as a tool for environmental justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Opole Studies in Administration and Law
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.5413
Primary Topic
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecocide: from a war crime to an international crime?

Jonatan Rigo-García
The Opole Studies in Administration and Law
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
article

Ecocide: from a war crime to an international crime?

Jonatan Rigo-García
article en

Abstract

in response to the relevance achieved in the last decade, this article explores the evolution of ecocide as a legal concept, from its origins to its contemporary status as a potential international crime, with the aim of assessing whether current proposals are viable and legally coherent. Using both historical and black-letter legal approaches, the research traces the reciprocal influence of early ecocide definitions on international humanitarian law, and how the latter in turn contributed to consolidating a particular legal conception of the former. Focusing on the key elements of the currently prohibited threshold of environmental damage during armed conflicts, the study addresses its limitations, highlighting the ambiguities of the terms and their unsuitability for peacetime application. We conclude that while ecocide was ultimately codified as a war crime in article 8.2(b)(iv) of the Rome Statute, its broader recognition as a standalone international crime requires clearer definitions and a reconsideration of the threshold criteria, in this way contributing to advancing the legal understanding of ecocide and its potential as a tool for environmental justice.

The Opole Studies in Administration and LawVol. 23(1)
Universitat de les Illes Balears (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.