A Structured Approach to Feature Prioritization for Dynamic Roadmap Optimization

An effective product strategy requires a systematic framework to prioritize features and match development with organizational objectives. The MoSCoW Prioritization framework provides a flexible, qualitative approach for classifying characteristics into Must Have, Should Have, Could Have, and Won’t Have categories, facilitating targeted decision-making. To assess its efficacy, five principal attributes—Stakeholder Alignment, Business Value, Customer Demand Level, Implementation Effort, and Strategic Relevance—were examined. Data supplied from productlift.dev facilitated a comparison of MoSCoW Prioritizations with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and the Weighted Scoring Model. Included materials were ranking templates, prioritization instruments, and result indicators. MoSCoW Prioritization regularly surpassed alternatives, exhibiting enhanced flexibility, interpretability, and strategic alignment. Quantitative study verified a 98% accuracy in prioritization throughout the implementation of roadmap scenarios. The findings validate the model’s potential to facilitate agile product planning and roadmap optimization, making it a pragmatic option for rapidly changing business contexts and significant product initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccsp64183.2025.11089247
Primary Topic
Real-time simulation and control systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Structured Approach to Feature Prioritization for Dynamic Roadmap Optimization

Cidambi Srinivasan, R. Saranya, G. Indumathi, Noor Ali Mohammed et al.
Real-time simulation and control systems
article

A Structured Approach to Feature Prioritization for Dynamic Roadmap Optimization

Cidambi Srinivasan, R. Saranya, G. Indumathi, Noor Ali Mohammed, Thirupurasundari Chandrasekaran
article en

Abstract

An effective product strategy requires a systematic framework to prioritize features and match development with organizational objectives. The MoSCoW Prioritization framework provides a flexible, qualitative approach for classifying characteristics into Must Have, Should Have, Could Have, and Won’t Have categories, facilitating targeted decision-making. To assess its efficacy, five principal attributes—Stakeholder Alignment, Business Value, Customer Demand Level, Implementation Effort, and Strategic Relevance—were examined. Data supplied from productlift.dev facilitated a comparison of MoSCoW Prioritizations with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and the Weighted Scoring Model. Included materials were ranking templates, prioritization instruments, and result indicators. MoSCoW Prioritization regularly surpassed alternatives, exhibiting enhanced flexibility, interpretability, and strategic alignment. Quantitative study verified a 98% accuracy in prioritization throughout the implementation of roadmap scenarios. The findings validate the model’s potential to facilitate agile product planning and roadmap optimization, making it a pragmatic option for rapidly changing business contexts and significant product initiatives.

Saint Joseph's College (US), Arunai Engineering College (IN), St. Joseph's Institute of Technology (IN), Mayo Clinic Hospital (US), Campbellsville University (US), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Real-time simulation and control systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Structured Approach to Feature Prioritization for Dynamic Roadmap Optimization — Cidambi Srinivasan, R. Saranya, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS