Comparative analysis of motion correction algorithms for contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging

Ultrasound imaging is widely used in medical diagnostics due to its speed, safety, and cost-effectiveness. However, restrictions like speckle noise and limited scan lines might cause a loss of image detail. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) overcomes these drawbacks by using microbubbles to improve tissue perfusion imaging and tumor identification. Despite its advantages, CEUS is highly prone to motion artifacts, particularly in dynamic applications such as Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (DCE-US), where patient or probe movement can significantly impact image quality. In conventional DCE-US, motion artifacts are frequently addressed by discarding the motion-affected frames, resulting in the loss of valuable data. To preserve image integrity and improve clinical analysis, recent advances have focused on developing motion correction algorithms. This study assesses four such algorithms—Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), U-Net, sub-pixel registration, and 2-tier image registration—using quantitative metrics such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Correlation Coefficient (CC), and Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM). The purpose of this study is to find the most effective way to reduce motion artifacts while improving the qualitative assessment of medical image analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/rait65068.2025.11088898
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of motion correction algorithms for contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging

Kuntal Chowdhury, Debabrata Ghosh, Shubham Shubham
Medical Imaging and Analysis
article

Comparative analysis of motion correction algorithms for contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging

Kuntal Chowdhury, Debabrata Ghosh, Shubham Shubham
article en

Abstract

Ultrasound imaging is widely used in medical diagnostics due to its speed, safety, and cost-effectiveness. However, restrictions like speckle noise and limited scan lines might cause a loss of image detail. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) overcomes these drawbacks by using microbubbles to improve tissue perfusion imaging and tumor identification. Despite its advantages, CEUS is highly prone to motion artifacts, particularly in dynamic applications such as Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (DCE-US), where patient or probe movement can significantly impact image quality. In conventional DCE-US, motion artifacts are frequently addressed by discarding the motion-affected frames, resulting in the loss of valuable data. To preserve image integrity and improve clinical analysis, recent advances have focused on developing motion correction algorithms. This study assesses four such algorithms—Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), U-Net, sub-pixel registration, and 2-tier image registration—using quantitative metrics such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Correlation Coefficient (CC), and Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM). The purpose of this study is to find the most effective way to reduce motion artifacts while improving the qualitative assessment of medical image analysis.

Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology (IN)
Ministry of Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative analysis of motion correction algorithms for contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging — Kuntal Chowdhury, Debabrata Ghosh, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS