Enhancing the Accuracy and Credibility of Peer Assessment through a Quadripartite Interaction Model: A Cognitive, Attitude, Motivation, and Social Relationship Approach

Peer assessment, as a learner-initiated assessment, can be used as an instructional strategy to foster higher-order thinking and enhance learning performance. The accuracy and reliability of different peer assessment models vary depending on the factors considered. Existing studies have considered learners' cognitive ability, attitude and motivation for peer assessment, but have not yet taken social relationship factors into account. Based on this, this study constructed a quadripartite interaction peer assessment model from four dimensions: cognitive, attitude, motivation, and social relationship. The model extracts learner characteristics from the four dimensions, and then corrects the peer assessment scores obtained by the learners to obtain accurate ratings. The results of teaching practice show that compared with the traditional peer assessment model, the quadripartite interaction peer assessment model is able to avoid the scoring errors caused by cognitive ability, attitude, assessment motivation, and social relationship, and improve the accuracy of the results of the peer assessment. The results of the interviews conducted with teachers and students show that the quadripartite interaction peer assessment model can improve the recognition and acceptance of the results of peer assessment by teachers and students, and then increase the motivation and enthusiasm of the learners to participate in peer assessment, which is of great significance for improving the quality of teaching and promoting the learners' independent learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cste64638.2025.11091911
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing the Accuracy and Credibility of Peer Assessment through a Quadripartite Interaction Model: A Cognitive, Attitude, Motivation, and Social Relationship Approach

Zijie Li, Haiyan Li, Mingjie Wang, Jun Wang et al.
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Enhancing the Accuracy and Credibility of Peer Assessment through a Quadripartite Interaction Model: A Cognitive, Attitude, Motivation, and Social Relationship Approach

Zijie Li, Haiyan Li, Mingjie Wang, Jun Wang, Shu Zhang
article en

Abstract

Peer assessment, as a learner-initiated assessment, can be used as an instructional strategy to foster higher-order thinking and enhance learning performance. The accuracy and reliability of different peer assessment models vary depending on the factors considered. Existing studies have considered learners' cognitive ability, attitude and motivation for peer assessment, but have not yet taken social relationship factors into account. Based on this, this study constructed a quadripartite interaction peer assessment model from four dimensions: cognitive, attitude, motivation, and social relationship. The model extracts learner characteristics from the four dimensions, and then corrects the peer assessment scores obtained by the learners to obtain accurate ratings. The results of teaching practice show that compared with the traditional peer assessment model, the quadripartite interaction peer assessment model is able to avoid the scoring errors caused by cognitive ability, attitude, assessment motivation, and social relationship, and improve the accuracy of the results of the peer assessment. The results of the interviews conducted with teachers and students show that the quadripartite interaction peer assessment model can improve the recognition and acceptance of the results of peer assessment by teachers and students, and then increase the motivation and enthusiasm of the learners to participate in peer assessment, which is of great significance for improving the quality of teaching and promoting the learners' independent learning.

Yunnan Normal University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Research and Development
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enhancing the Accuracy and Credibility of Peer Assessment through a Quadripartite Interaction Model: A Cognitive, Attitude, Motivation, and Social Relationship Approach — Zijie Li, Haiyan Li, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS